1 00:00:05,269 --> 00:00:02,070 all right so we're going to go ahead and 2 00:00:07,190 --> 00:00:05,279 get started uh welcome to this session 3 00:00:09,030 --> 00:00:07,200 this is the prebiotic chemistry and 4 00:00:10,950 --> 00:00:09,040 early earth environment session on the 5 00:00:13,030 --> 00:00:10,960 origins inventories and geologic 6 00:00:14,870 --> 00:00:13,040 settings of the building blocks of life 7 00:00:16,870 --> 00:00:14,880 we're your session chairs i'm lori barge 8 00:00:18,870 --> 00:00:16,880 from nasa jpl and this is danielle 9 00:00:20,630 --> 00:00:18,880 simkis from nasa goddard 10 00:00:24,790 --> 00:00:20,640 and so then introducing our first 11 00:00:29,109 --> 00:00:26,550 thank you very much 12 00:00:31,429 --> 00:00:29,119 i hope you'll hear and see my 13 00:00:33,110 --> 00:00:31,439 presentation 14 00:00:36,630 --> 00:00:33,120 so this is uh 15 00:00:38,869 --> 00:00:36,640 this is my abs icon talk uh welcome to 16 00:00:41,030 --> 00:00:38,879 to this presentation uh titled the 17 00:00:42,229 --> 00:00:41,040 effects of geological and environmental 18 00:00:44,549 --> 00:00:42,239 conditions 19 00:00:46,389 --> 00:00:44,559 on the rise of probiotic peptides on 20 00:00:49,029 --> 00:00:46,399 mineral surfaces 21 00:00:51,110 --> 00:00:49,039 uh i'm thomas lostoler a phd candidate i 22 00:00:53,830 --> 00:00:51,120 work at roger boshkovich institute in 23 00:00:55,029 --> 00:00:53,840 croatia here are my contact details and 24 00:00:57,670 --> 00:00:55,039 i thank 25 00:01:00,790 --> 00:00:57,680 all co-authors with whom i worked on 26 00:01:06,070 --> 00:01:01,590 so 27 00:01:08,469 --> 00:01:06,080 the importance of prebiotic peptides 28 00:01:10,550 --> 00:01:08,479 in a probiotic world is obvious it is 29 00:01:13,590 --> 00:01:10,560 hypothesized that they were included in 30 00:01:14,630 --> 00:01:13,600 molecular symbiosis with nucleic acids 31 00:01:17,190 --> 00:01:14,640 and 32 00:01:18,390 --> 00:01:17,200 they have really important catalytic 33 00:01:19,910 --> 00:01:18,400 properties 34 00:01:22,830 --> 00:01:19,920 there are different literature 35 00:01:25,590 --> 00:01:22,840 approaches on how to synthesize 36 00:01:28,070 --> 00:01:25,600 oligopeptides and they mostly uh 37 00:01:30,789 --> 00:01:28,080 understandably so rely on 38 00:01:33,350 --> 00:01:30,799 reactions in aqueous solutions 39 00:01:36,310 --> 00:01:33,360 however from a thermodynamic standpoint 40 00:01:38,630 --> 00:01:36,320 condensation of free amino acids 41 00:01:40,390 --> 00:01:38,640 in aqueous solution is thermodynamically 42 00:01:42,550 --> 00:01:40,400 unfavorable process 43 00:01:44,950 --> 00:01:42,560 and here i would refer to everett 44 00:01:47,830 --> 00:01:44,960 shock's talk at apps icon 45 00:01:49,510 --> 00:01:47,840 when he said that when seeking a biotic 46 00:01:53,030 --> 00:01:49,520 organic synthesis 47 00:01:54,550 --> 00:01:53,040 we should stop fighting thermodynamics 48 00:01:56,389 --> 00:01:54,560 if we do that if we stop fighting 49 00:01:58,950 --> 00:01:56,399 thermodynamics we would have to move 50 00:02:01,429 --> 00:01:58,960 away from aqueous solutions 51 00:02:03,830 --> 00:02:01,439 and we would end up in dry environments 52 00:02:05,030 --> 00:02:03,840 so the availability of dry land on 53 00:02:06,950 --> 00:02:05,040 prebiotic 54 00:02:09,430 --> 00:02:06,960 earth is often discussed 55 00:02:11,350 --> 00:02:09,440 but it is considered that there was some 56 00:02:12,630 --> 00:02:11,360 land available on the emerging 57 00:02:15,510 --> 00:02:12,640 continents 58 00:02:18,470 --> 00:02:15,520 and near volcanoes 59 00:02:20,150 --> 00:02:18,480 if you want to do uh organic synthesis 60 00:02:22,949 --> 00:02:20,160 in the solid state 61 00:02:25,190 --> 00:02:22,959 uh probably uh one of the best options 62 00:02:28,309 --> 00:02:25,200 would be to use a mechanochemist 63 00:02:30,869 --> 00:02:28,319 mechanochemistry is a very uh vibrant 64 00:02:33,030 --> 00:02:30,879 research research field 65 00:02:35,670 --> 00:02:33,040 that is compliant with the principles of 66 00:02:39,030 --> 00:02:35,680 green chemistry it uses mechanical 67 00:02:41,670 --> 00:02:39,040 activation to induce chemical reactivity 68 00:02:44,550 --> 00:02:41,680 in the absence of solvents 69 00:02:47,190 --> 00:02:44,560 and there are uh different types of 70 00:02:49,830 --> 00:02:47,200 mechanochemical instruments which exert 71 00:02:51,350 --> 00:02:49,840 different mechanical forces on the 72 00:02:54,150 --> 00:02:51,360 reaction mixtures 73 00:02:57,509 --> 00:02:54,160 there are vibratory ball mills planetary 74 00:02:59,030 --> 00:02:57,519 ball mills and extruders 75 00:03:02,149 --> 00:02:59,040 and when talking about 76 00:03:04,390 --> 00:03:02,159 mechanical energy on the 77 00:03:06,070 --> 00:03:04,400 prebiotic earth and in the context of 78 00:03:09,190 --> 00:03:06,080 origin of life 79 00:03:10,949 --> 00:03:09,200 it is mostly associated with uh surface 80 00:03:12,710 --> 00:03:10,959 impact events 81 00:03:15,110 --> 00:03:12,720 however the relevance for probiotic 82 00:03:17,430 --> 00:03:15,120 chemistry is hard to predict 83 00:03:20,309 --> 00:03:17,440 given the uncertainty and frequency of 84 00:03:22,309 --> 00:03:20,319 their appearance over time 85 00:03:24,149 --> 00:03:22,319 but the sources of 86 00:03:26,470 --> 00:03:24,159 mechanical energy on early earth could 87 00:03:30,229 --> 00:03:26,480 have been much more diverse 88 00:03:32,949 --> 00:03:30,239 for example they could have included 89 00:03:35,670 --> 00:03:32,959 tectonics earthquakes 90 00:03:38,229 --> 00:03:35,680 but also geomorphological processes such 91 00:03:40,710 --> 00:03:38,239 as erosion and weathering 92 00:03:42,869 --> 00:03:40,720 uh specifically erosion weathering are 93 00:03:45,509 --> 00:03:42,879 known to occur more frequently and are 94 00:03:47,990 --> 00:03:45,519 capable of exchanging matter 95 00:03:49,589 --> 00:03:48,000 on the planetary surface 96 00:03:51,830 --> 00:03:49,599 the use of 97 00:03:53,589 --> 00:03:51,840 mechanochemistry in probiotic chemistry 98 00:03:55,270 --> 00:03:53,599 has been demonstrated 99 00:03:57,030 --> 00:03:55,280 in the literature 100 00:04:01,270 --> 00:03:57,040 in the cases of 101 00:04:04,949 --> 00:04:01,280 amino acid derivatives and sugars 102 00:04:07,910 --> 00:04:05,990 we 103 00:04:09,670 --> 00:04:07,920 try to obtain oligopeptides by 104 00:04:11,990 --> 00:04:09,680 mechanochemistry and we explore 105 00:04:14,070 --> 00:04:12,000 different reaction parameters 106 00:04:16,069 --> 00:04:14,080 namely the effects of temperature 107 00:04:17,110 --> 00:04:16,079 mechanical loading 108 00:04:18,469 --> 00:04:17,120 time 109 00:04:20,229 --> 00:04:18,479 atmosphere 110 00:04:22,390 --> 00:04:20,239 real mineral surfaces 111 00:04:24,150 --> 00:04:22,400 and different combinations of amino 112 00:04:26,070 --> 00:04:24,160 acids 113 00:04:28,230 --> 00:04:26,080 so when considering the effect of 114 00:04:31,990 --> 00:04:28,240 temperature 115 00:04:35,270 --> 00:04:32,000 we milled glycine with titanium dioxide 116 00:04:37,590 --> 00:04:35,280 in a in a ball mill uh we used uh this 117 00:04:40,629 --> 00:04:37,600 kind of setup that was developed in our 118 00:04:41,909 --> 00:04:40,639 lab which enables us to perform 119 00:04:43,990 --> 00:04:41,919 temperature temperature-controlled 120 00:04:45,749 --> 00:04:44,000 mechanochemical reactions 121 00:04:48,790 --> 00:04:45,759 uh some of these findings have already 122 00:04:50,629 --> 00:04:48,800 been published last year 123 00:04:52,550 --> 00:04:50,639 and by iron pairing high performance 124 00:04:54,310 --> 00:04:52,560 liquid chromatography 125 00:04:56,390 --> 00:04:54,320 we could 126 00:04:57,670 --> 00:04:56,400 see that by increasing the the milling 127 00:05:00,870 --> 00:04:57,680 temperature 128 00:05:03,590 --> 00:05:00,880 we obtained a longer glycine oligomers 129 00:05:06,310 --> 00:05:03,600 alongside with the formation of a 130 00:05:08,230 --> 00:05:06,320 predominant uh 131 00:05:11,430 --> 00:05:08,240 part of the reaction mixture which was 132 00:05:14,629 --> 00:05:11,440 uh cyclic dicatopirazine 133 00:05:17,189 --> 00:05:14,639 so total yield of linear oligomers 134 00:05:19,909 --> 00:05:17,199 uh was the highest around 10 percent 135 00:05:21,830 --> 00:05:19,919 when the reaction was performed at 100 136 00:05:24,230 --> 00:05:21,840 degrees celsius 137 00:05:26,390 --> 00:05:24,240 where we obtained glee 8 138 00:05:29,510 --> 00:05:26,400 oligomer 139 00:05:32,790 --> 00:05:29,520 also we validated some of the results by 140 00:05:35,189 --> 00:05:32,800 lcms quadruple time of flight analysis 141 00:05:36,870 --> 00:05:35,199 here we see the results for the reaction 142 00:05:40,230 --> 00:05:36,880 where glycine was milled with titanium 143 00:05:42,710 --> 00:05:40,240 dioxide at 130 degrees celsius 144 00:05:45,189 --> 00:05:42,720 where we observe the ligomers up to glee 145 00:05:48,310 --> 00:05:45,199 11. 146 00:05:49,510 --> 00:05:48,320 next we turn two uh different amino 147 00:05:51,990 --> 00:05:49,520 acids 148 00:05:54,310 --> 00:05:52,000 so this is a chromatogram for milling 149 00:05:57,430 --> 00:05:54,320 glycine with alanine with titanium 150 00:05:59,749 --> 00:05:57,440 dioxide at 100 degrees celsius 151 00:06:02,309 --> 00:05:59,759 we can see that there are 152 00:06:04,309 --> 00:06:02,319 several peaks which would indicate that 153 00:06:07,430 --> 00:06:04,319 there was some reactivity 154 00:06:09,350 --> 00:06:07,440 and by direct injection to ms uh we 155 00:06:11,909 --> 00:06:09,360 could confirm that 156 00:06:13,909 --> 00:06:11,919 uh glycine and alanine dipeptides as 157 00:06:15,830 --> 00:06:13,919 well as tripeptides have been 158 00:06:17,590 --> 00:06:15,840 synthesized in this way 159 00:06:19,909 --> 00:06:17,600 thus demonstrating that 160 00:06:23,430 --> 00:06:19,919 other amino acids can be incorporated 161 00:06:24,870 --> 00:06:23,440 into a growing peptide chain 162 00:06:25,670 --> 00:06:24,880 after that 163 00:06:26,870 --> 00:06:25,680 we 164 00:06:28,309 --> 00:06:26,880 explored 165 00:06:30,469 --> 00:06:28,319 the 166 00:06:32,070 --> 00:06:30,479 different amounts of mechanical loading 167 00:06:33,110 --> 00:06:32,080 that is transferred to the reaction 168 00:06:35,430 --> 00:06:33,120 mixture 169 00:06:38,469 --> 00:06:35,440 we could do that simply by 170 00:06:40,150 --> 00:06:38,479 variation of the milling frequency 171 00:06:41,830 --> 00:06:40,160 so for example 172 00:06:43,909 --> 00:06:41,840 uh when the reaction 173 00:06:46,150 --> 00:06:43,919 of milling glycine with silicon dioxide 174 00:06:48,710 --> 00:06:46,160 at room temperature for 96 hours was 175 00:06:49,909 --> 00:06:48,720 performed at five hertz 176 00:06:51,189 --> 00:06:49,919 we could 177 00:06:54,469 --> 00:06:51,199 detect 178 00:06:57,990 --> 00:06:54,479 the presence of glycine tripeptide 179 00:07:01,350 --> 00:06:58,000 so a milling frequency of 5 hertz 180 00:07:03,990 --> 00:07:01,360 is a very low frequency which could 181 00:07:05,670 --> 00:07:04,000 mimic for example erosion or weathering 182 00:07:07,589 --> 00:07:05,680 processes 183 00:07:13,110 --> 00:07:07,599 so 184 00:07:15,350 --> 00:07:13,120 titanium dioxide using three hand-picked 185 00:07:18,070 --> 00:07:15,360 stones as milling media 186 00:07:21,029 --> 00:07:18,080 for 18 hours at 20 hertz and ambient 187 00:07:24,870 --> 00:07:21,039 temperature uh results from 188 00:07:27,510 --> 00:07:24,880 iphplc show that glycine ligaments up to 189 00:07:29,270 --> 00:07:27,520 tetrapeptide have been formed in this 190 00:07:31,830 --> 00:07:29,280 way 191 00:07:33,430 --> 00:07:31,840 after that we explored uh the effects of 192 00:07:35,350 --> 00:07:33,440 time 193 00:07:38,469 --> 00:07:35,360 so as hypothesized 194 00:07:40,070 --> 00:07:38,479 uh it was demonstrated that time is an 195 00:07:41,830 --> 00:07:40,080 important parameter 196 00:07:44,710 --> 00:07:41,840 so when comparing reactions that were 197 00:07:46,629 --> 00:07:44,720 performed from one hour up to 96 hours 198 00:07:48,230 --> 00:07:46,639 or four days 199 00:07:51,430 --> 00:07:48,240 we could see that there is almost 200 00:07:54,150 --> 00:07:51,440 exponential increase in the total yield 201 00:07:56,150 --> 00:07:54,160 of linear oligomers around 2.5 percent 202 00:07:58,550 --> 00:07:56,160 when the reaction was performed 203 00:08:02,950 --> 00:07:58,560 at 40 degrees celsius 204 00:08:06,230 --> 00:08:05,270 we also explored the effects of 205 00:08:07,909 --> 00:08:06,240 different 206 00:08:08,950 --> 00:08:07,919 atmospheres 207 00:08:09,830 --> 00:08:08,960 so 208 00:08:10,790 --> 00:08:09,840 here 209 00:08:13,749 --> 00:08:10,800 we 210 00:08:14,950 --> 00:08:13,759 used nitrogen and carbon dioxide as one 211 00:08:16,950 --> 00:08:14,960 of the two 212 00:08:18,790 --> 00:08:16,960 primary components of early earth 213 00:08:21,670 --> 00:08:18,800 atmosphere and by 214 00:08:23,589 --> 00:08:21,680 lcms triple quadruple 215 00:08:29,350 --> 00:08:23,599 we could 216 00:08:31,670 --> 00:08:29,360 up to glyce 7 217 00:08:34,070 --> 00:08:31,680 were formed when milling in in nitrogen 218 00:08:37,029 --> 00:08:34,080 atmosphere and glycine oligomers up to 219 00:08:38,550 --> 00:08:37,039 glycine 6 were formed when milling was 220 00:08:41,990 --> 00:08:38,560 performed in 221 00:08:47,190 --> 00:08:44,870 uh finally we turned to uh milling with 222 00:08:48,550 --> 00:08:47,200 real mineral surfaces 223 00:08:49,910 --> 00:08:48,560 we managed to 224 00:08:51,350 --> 00:08:49,920 obtain 225 00:08:55,190 --> 00:08:51,360 10 different 226 00:08:57,590 --> 00:08:55,200 classes of minerals representing 227 00:09:02,550 --> 00:08:57,600 different different mineral classes 228 00:09:06,230 --> 00:09:02,560 and by lcms triple quadruple analysis 229 00:09:08,790 --> 00:09:06,240 we could detect that one of the best 230 00:09:11,350 --> 00:09:08,800 minerals for uh 231 00:09:14,230 --> 00:09:11,360 producing oligopeptides were calcite and 232 00:09:16,310 --> 00:09:14,240 magnesite where we formed glycine 233 00:09:18,710 --> 00:09:16,320 tetrapeptides 234 00:09:22,630 --> 00:09:18,720 but the best was quartz so crystalline 235 00:09:25,190 --> 00:09:22,640 silica uh where we detected glycine 236 00:09:27,750 --> 00:09:25,200 hepta peptide 237 00:09:30,949 --> 00:09:27,760 for example here are the chromatograms 238 00:09:33,990 --> 00:09:30,959 of lcms triple quadruple analysis 239 00:09:35,670 --> 00:09:34,000 using magnesite where gly4 is observed 240 00:09:39,190 --> 00:09:35,680 and quartz 241 00:09:43,030 --> 00:09:39,200 uh oligopeptides up to uh glycine seven 242 00:09:47,829 --> 00:09:45,110 finally at the end we were interested to 243 00:09:51,190 --> 00:09:47,839 see uh if the oligomerization 244 00:09:54,389 --> 00:09:51,200 under mechanochemical conditions also uh 245 00:09:57,590 --> 00:09:54,399 proceeds if amino acids are uh reacted 246 00:09:59,430 --> 00:09:57,600 with hydroxy acid acids to form depth 247 00:10:01,509 --> 00:09:59,440 peptides 248 00:10:02,949 --> 00:10:01,519 therefore we milk glycine and glycolic 249 00:10:05,190 --> 00:10:02,959 acids and 250 00:10:06,150 --> 00:10:05,200 we could observe by 251 00:10:09,670 --> 00:10:06,160 maldi 252 00:10:12,310 --> 00:10:09,680 time of flight analysis that uh 253 00:10:15,430 --> 00:10:12,320 dimer uh deputy peptide dammer was 254 00:10:18,150 --> 00:10:15,440 formed this way alongside at least four 255 00:10:19,990 --> 00:10:18,160 other depths peptides 256 00:10:22,550 --> 00:10:20,000 and the uh 257 00:10:24,790 --> 00:10:22,560 longest depth peptide obtained in this 258 00:10:27,110 --> 00:10:24,800 way so by milling glycine and glycolic 259 00:10:30,150 --> 00:10:27,120 acid with silicon dioxide at room 260 00:10:31,509 --> 00:10:30,160 temperature for 16 hours and at 30 hertz 261 00:10:32,550 --> 00:10:31,519 we obtained 262 00:10:33,910 --> 00:10:32,560 uh 263 00:10:35,590 --> 00:10:33,920 illegal 264 00:10:36,710 --> 00:10:35,600 debsi peptides 265 00:10:39,190 --> 00:10:36,720 containing 266 00:10:42,630 --> 00:10:39,200 three glycine residues as well as three 267 00:10:44,870 --> 00:10:42,640 glycolic acid residues so in summary 268 00:10:46,310 --> 00:10:44,880 the formation of peptides is operational 269 00:10:48,150 --> 00:10:46,320 under different geological and 270 00:10:49,750 --> 00:10:48,160 environmental scenarios in a dry 271 00:10:51,269 --> 00:10:49,760 probiotic setting 272 00:10:53,110 --> 00:10:51,279 this might have implications for 273 00:10:54,949 --> 00:10:53,120 astrobiology research and 274 00:10:56,710 --> 00:10:54,959 reconsideration of extraterrestrial 275 00:10:58,150 --> 00:10:56,720 conditions that can give rise to 276 00:11:00,550 --> 00:10:58,160 peptides 277 00:11:03,110 --> 00:11:00,560 for example a weathering of amino acids 278 00:11:05,829 --> 00:11:03,120 in dry settings on mineral surfaces 279 00:11:08,150 --> 00:11:05,839 might result in peptides 280 00:11:09,430 --> 00:11:08,160 with this i want to end and thank 281 00:11:10,790 --> 00:11:09,440 all of my 282 00:11:13,910 --> 00:11:10,800 co-authors 283 00:11:16,230 --> 00:11:13,920 and the funding agency and i thank you 284 00:11:18,150 --> 00:11:16,240 for your attention and i'm now open for 285 00:11:24,790 --> 00:11:18,160 taking questions 286 00:11:27,829 --> 00:11:24,800 [Applause] 287 00:11:29,509 --> 00:11:27,839 you have time for a couple questions 288 00:11:32,230 --> 00:11:29,519 for an interesting talk john yen 289 00:11:35,670 --> 00:11:32,240 university of wisconsin um in your 290 00:11:37,430 --> 00:11:35,680 characterization of peptides on minerals 291 00:11:39,670 --> 00:11:37,440 i wonder 292 00:11:41,430 --> 00:11:39,680 did you do this on a mass basis of 293 00:11:43,750 --> 00:11:41,440 mineral or 294 00:11:46,470 --> 00:11:43,760 do you have some way of 295 00:11:48,150 --> 00:11:46,480 quantifying the surface area i think the 296 00:11:49,350 --> 00:11:48,160 minerals you showed have a number of 297 00:11:51,350 --> 00:11:49,360 different 298 00:11:54,790 --> 00:11:51,360 probably surface areas per volume could 299 00:11:59,910 --> 00:11:56,629 thank you very much for your question i 300 00:12:04,150 --> 00:11:59,920 will just share the this screen again 301 00:12:06,710 --> 00:12:04,160 so uh what we did uh was we used an 302 00:12:09,829 --> 00:12:06,720 excess of mineral surface 303 00:12:13,110 --> 00:12:09,839 with respect to the uh glycine amino 304 00:12:17,110 --> 00:12:13,120 acids you know we wanted to respect that 305 00:12:21,509 --> 00:12:19,590 more available available in organic 306 00:12:23,670 --> 00:12:21,519 material when compared to organic 307 00:12:25,750 --> 00:12:23,680 material for example on early earth 308 00:12:26,949 --> 00:12:25,760 therefore we used five to one molar 309 00:12:30,150 --> 00:12:26,959 ratio 310 00:12:34,069 --> 00:12:30,160 in favor of excess of minerals 311 00:12:36,949 --> 00:12:34,079 so this is the the variable that we used 312 00:12:39,509 --> 00:12:36,959 uh so far we still didn't 313 00:12:42,629 --> 00:12:39,519 check the surface areas 314 00:12:45,269 --> 00:12:42,639 but this is still an ongoing study so 315 00:12:49,350 --> 00:12:45,279 we will have more data on this i hope 316 00:12:53,030 --> 00:12:51,509 um hey really amazing talk i'm luke 317 00:12:55,190 --> 00:12:53,040 stella from the australian center for 318 00:12:56,710 --> 00:12:55,200 astrobiology i was really interested 319 00:12:58,710 --> 00:12:56,720 with the time 320 00:13:00,790 --> 00:12:58,720 experiments you did and curious why you 321 00:13:02,230 --> 00:13:00,800 stopped at 96 hours when it seemed to be 322 00:13:04,150 --> 00:13:02,240 getting really good like could you run 323 00:13:05,990 --> 00:13:04,160 it for months or i don't know like 324 00:13:08,550 --> 00:13:06,000 what's the end 325 00:13:11,910 --> 00:13:08,560 and limit there 326 00:13:14,150 --> 00:13:11,920 thank you very much luke uh 327 00:13:16,230 --> 00:13:14,160 funny that you asked this question 328 00:13:17,590 --> 00:13:16,240 because my research group is 329 00:13:19,829 --> 00:13:17,600 predominantly 330 00:13:22,069 --> 00:13:19,839 in the mechanochemistry let's say 331 00:13:23,829 --> 00:13:22,079 research area i'm the only one working 332 00:13:24,710 --> 00:13:23,839 in the prebiotic chemistry or origin of 333 00:13:27,030 --> 00:13:24,720 life 334 00:13:29,430 --> 00:13:27,040 therefore we have several 335 00:13:32,150 --> 00:13:29,440 milling instruments and a big research 336 00:13:34,710 --> 00:13:32,160 group so the time that is available to 337 00:13:36,790 --> 00:13:34,720 perform the experiment is limited 338 00:13:39,110 --> 00:13:36,800 and believe me i pushed as far as i 339 00:13:40,470 --> 00:13:39,120 could i almost got expelled from my 340 00:13:43,829 --> 00:13:40,480 research group 341 00:13:47,189 --> 00:13:43,839 uh just just just joking of course but 342 00:13:50,230 --> 00:13:47,199 this is the only reason basically why 343 00:13:53,990 --> 00:13:50,240 we stopped at 96 hours 344 00:13:55,590 --> 00:13:54,000 we could of course do longer milling but 345 00:13:57,910 --> 00:13:55,600 this also 346 00:13:59,509 --> 00:13:57,920 puts a lot of stress on the milling 347 00:14:03,269 --> 00:13:59,519 instrument which 348 00:14:03,990 --> 00:14:03,279 of course is prone to breaking 349 00:14:07,110 --> 00:14:04,000 so 350 00:14:09,829 --> 00:14:07,120 yes thank you maybe maybe we will 351 00:14:13,430 --> 00:14:09,839 try try to also do one experiment at 352 00:14:14,790 --> 00:14:13,440 least uh with longer milling time 353 00:14:16,389 --> 00:14:14,800 leave it over the summer holidays or 354 00:14:17,509 --> 00:14:16,399 something and come back in three months 355 00:14:19,430 --> 00:14:17,519 and yeah 356 00:14:21,189 --> 00:14:19,440 no thank you it's great 357 00:14:22,389 --> 00:14:21,199 thank you very much 358 00:14:24,470 --> 00:14:22,399 one more question 359 00:14:25,430 --> 00:14:24,480 do we have time or no time for one more 360 00:14:27,910 --> 00:14:25,440 okay 361 00:14:29,430 --> 00:14:27,920 hi i'm ellie from cu boulder and i saw 362 00:14:31,269 --> 00:14:29,440 that you had three different minerals 363 00:14:32,150 --> 00:14:31,279 that you um were saying were really good 364 00:14:33,750 --> 00:14:32,160 at this 365 00:14:35,430 --> 00:14:33,760 is there anything universal about the 366 00:14:37,670 --> 00:14:35,440 surface chemistries between these three 367 00:14:39,509 --> 00:14:37,680 minerals that are kind of good at 368 00:14:41,030 --> 00:14:39,519 promoting this kind of reaction like 369 00:14:42,790 --> 00:14:41,040 what is it about the surface chemistry 370 00:14:44,310 --> 00:14:42,800 that's leading to this and can we use 371 00:14:46,629 --> 00:14:44,320 that to predict what other minerals 372 00:14:48,470 --> 00:14:46,639 would be good at this 373 00:14:51,030 --> 00:14:48,480 thank you very much for your question as 374 00:14:52,550 --> 00:14:51,040 i said this is still an ongoing part of 375 00:14:55,509 --> 00:14:52,560 the project 376 00:14:58,150 --> 00:14:55,519 maybe i could give the best answer 377 00:14:59,670 --> 00:14:58,160 for quartz mineral since most of our 378 00:15:03,269 --> 00:14:59,680 reactions 379 00:15:05,670 --> 00:15:03,279 we used uh silicon dioxide you know 380 00:15:06,629 --> 00:15:05,680 the same commercial one that 381 00:15:10,550 --> 00:15:06,639 people 382 00:15:16,629 --> 00:15:13,750 so it's not surprising that quartz which 383 00:15:19,910 --> 00:15:16,639 is a crystal and silicon dioxide uh 384 00:15:22,150 --> 00:15:19,920 would have like similar uh 385 00:15:24,710 --> 00:15:22,160 similar activity and ability to produce 386 00:15:25,509 --> 00:15:24,720 oligopeptides 387 00:15:30,230 --> 00:15:25,519 uh 388 00:15:33,269 --> 00:15:30,240 go into mechanistic studies but 389 00:15:35,590 --> 00:15:33,279 what i can tell you from the literature 390 00:15:38,150 --> 00:15:35,600 is that titanium dioxide as well as 391 00:15:40,150 --> 00:15:38,160 silicon dioxide there have been some 392 00:15:41,350 --> 00:15:40,160 computational studies uh you know 393 00:15:43,350 --> 00:15:41,360 showing that 394 00:15:44,150 --> 00:15:43,360 they have absorption properties as well 395 00:15:46,550 --> 00:15:44,160 as 396 00:15:48,870 --> 00:15:46,560 properties of binding water molecules 397 00:15:51,749 --> 00:15:48,880 that are released uh during the reaction 398 00:15:54,470 --> 00:15:51,759 when oligopeptides are are formed 399 00:15:56,389 --> 00:15:54,480 so there is this kind of dual role 400 00:15:58,550 --> 00:15:56,399 but of course these studies are on very 401 00:16:01,509 --> 00:15:58,560 let's say simple minerals as i said 402 00:16:03,509 --> 00:16:01,519 titanium dioxide or silicon dioxide so 403 00:16:05,910 --> 00:16:03,519 at this moment i could not give you a 404 00:16:08,069 --> 00:16:05,920 better answer but this is certainly very 405 00:16:09,749 --> 00:16:08,079 interesting 406 00:16:10,790 --> 00:16:09,759 thank you very much 407 00:16:18,710 --> 00:16:10,800 all right we're gonna move on to our 408 00:16:18,720 --> 00:16:30,389 our next speaker is kelvin smith 409 00:16:33,430 --> 00:16:32,550 myself 410 00:16:36,870 --> 00:16:33,440 okay 411 00:16:37,829 --> 00:16:36,880 thank you very much uh my name is kelvin 412 00:16:41,189 --> 00:16:37,839 smith 413 00:16:43,430 --> 00:16:41,199 um i'm a six year phd uh student a phd 414 00:16:45,749 --> 00:16:43,440 candidate from georgia tech and i want 415 00:16:46,870 --> 00:16:45,759 to thank apps.com for having me speak 416 00:16:47,590 --> 00:16:46,880 today 417 00:16:50,949 --> 00:16:47,600 so 418 00:16:52,870 --> 00:16:50,959 my presentation is on thermodynamic and 419 00:16:54,949 --> 00:16:52,880 kinetic investigation 420 00:16:57,269 --> 00:16:54,959 of oligomerization and degradation of 421 00:16:59,910 --> 00:16:57,279 density peptides under prebiotic earth 422 00:17:02,550 --> 00:16:59,920 conditions let's get started 423 00:17:04,710 --> 00:17:02,560 so to introduce a topic i want to um say 424 00:17:08,309 --> 00:17:04,720 why is research is important the origins 425 00:17:09,270 --> 00:17:08,319 of life is a long lasting puzzle that 426 00:17:11,829 --> 00:17:09,280 has been 427 00:17:13,350 --> 00:17:11,839 trying to be deciphered for many years 428 00:17:19,829 --> 00:17:13,360 um 429 00:17:22,990 --> 00:17:19,839 it is through peptide bond 430 00:17:24,949 --> 00:17:23,000 formation because of the formation of 431 00:17:26,390 --> 00:17:24,959 diketoperazine and thermodynamic 432 00:17:27,510 --> 00:17:26,400 unfavorability 433 00:17:29,830 --> 00:17:27,520 of that 434 00:17:31,350 --> 00:17:29,840 sort of reaction so how is that able to 435 00:17:32,549 --> 00:17:31,360 be formed under plausibly prebiotic 436 00:17:34,150 --> 00:17:32,559 conditions 437 00:17:37,350 --> 00:17:34,160 and 438 00:17:39,990 --> 00:17:37,360 one molecule it's a simple molecule 439 00:17:41,590 --> 00:17:40,000 but it's a paramount importance um so 440 00:17:43,909 --> 00:17:41,600 much so that it's studied in the 441 00:17:47,590 --> 00:17:43,919 literature quite a bit in lactic acid 442 00:17:50,070 --> 00:17:47,600 and how it can form uh polyesters which 443 00:17:52,390 --> 00:17:50,080 could be the first step into forming a 444 00:17:53,430 --> 00:17:52,400 uh a depth of peptide 445 00:18:01,750 --> 00:17:53,440 so 446 00:18:04,310 --> 00:18:01,760 know is in the kinetics of lactic acid 447 00:18:07,909 --> 00:18:04,320 we are aware of certain mechanisms such 448 00:18:10,549 --> 00:18:07,919 as backbiting and uh singing so bad body 449 00:18:14,310 --> 00:18:10,559 forms a six-membered ring on an o-h 450 00:18:17,110 --> 00:18:14,320 terminus of a dipeptide um to form a 451 00:18:18,070 --> 00:18:17,120 cyclic ester or cyclic amide 452 00:18:20,470 --> 00:18:18,080 um 453 00:18:23,590 --> 00:18:20,480 incision can cleave off 454 00:18:24,950 --> 00:18:23,600 a certain ester moiety on 455 00:18:30,870 --> 00:18:24,960 any sort of 456 00:18:31,909 --> 00:18:30,880 also know thanks to um 457 00:18:35,669 --> 00:18:31,919 you know 458 00:18:37,750 --> 00:18:35,679 um from dr j forsythe about estrogen 459 00:18:39,909 --> 00:18:37,760 exchange that there's a plausible 460 00:18:42,470 --> 00:18:39,919 pathway towards 461 00:18:43,190 --> 00:18:42,480 peptides but what we don't know 462 00:18:44,710 --> 00:18:43,200 is 463 00:18:46,070 --> 00:18:44,720 what are the thermodynamic driving 464 00:18:49,510 --> 00:18:46,080 forces 465 00:18:51,750 --> 00:18:49,520 um that go towards exchange and 466 00:18:54,230 --> 00:18:51,760 this uh oligomerization or sterification 467 00:18:57,430 --> 00:18:54,240 of lactic acid or similar 468 00:19:00,789 --> 00:18:57,440 hydroxy acids and can we and are we able 469 00:19:03,350 --> 00:19:00,799 to quantify them so that's what um what 470 00:19:04,710 --> 00:19:03,360 our experiment our research is about i 471 00:19:06,710 --> 00:19:04,720 make a 472 00:19:08,230 --> 00:19:06,720 uh chemical model 473 00:19:09,190 --> 00:19:08,240 um that would help 474 00:19:11,830 --> 00:19:09,200 create 475 00:19:13,430 --> 00:19:11,840 uh energy plots gibbs energy plots as a 476 00:19:15,270 --> 00:19:13,440 function of ph 477 00:19:18,070 --> 00:19:15,280 and pka 478 00:19:20,310 --> 00:19:18,080 of monomers and dimers and the contour 479 00:19:23,510 --> 00:19:20,320 map and i also make contour maps that 480 00:19:26,230 --> 00:19:23,520 display conversions towards products 481 00:19:28,789 --> 00:19:26,240 and the hypothesis so we hypothesize is 482 00:19:30,950 --> 00:19:28,799 ph and pka do play a major role in the 483 00:19:33,830 --> 00:19:30,960 thermodynamic driving forces 484 00:19:35,110 --> 00:19:33,840 um mainly the pka shift between monitors 485 00:19:37,110 --> 00:19:35,120 and dimers 486 00:19:39,750 --> 00:19:37,120 uh but the temperature because of the 487 00:19:42,710 --> 00:19:39,760 thermal neutrality um 488 00:19:43,510 --> 00:19:42,720 from whitski and vu for um 489 00:19:45,750 --> 00:19:43,520 um 490 00:19:49,510 --> 00:19:45,760 simple elimination of esters kind of 491 00:19:52,789 --> 00:19:49,520 plays plays a little bit of a minor role 492 00:19:55,830 --> 00:19:52,799 so um so my methods is i first start 493 00:19:58,150 --> 00:19:55,840 with a working reaction a very simple 494 00:20:00,789 --> 00:19:58,160 overall reaction of 495 00:20:03,270 --> 00:20:00,799 sterification and i break it down into 496 00:20:06,950 --> 00:20:03,280 dissociation states and each of those 497 00:20:09,270 --> 00:20:06,960 association states are a function of ph 498 00:20:11,270 --> 00:20:09,280 the amount is dependent on ph 499 00:20:12,950 --> 00:20:11,280 and that and that amount is 500 00:20:14,710 --> 00:20:12,960 further dictated from stoichiometric 501 00:20:17,430 --> 00:20:14,720 coefficients which are the mole 502 00:20:20,230 --> 00:20:17,440 fractions of these association states 503 00:20:22,470 --> 00:20:20,240 then i will perform an atom balance so i 504 00:20:25,029 --> 00:20:22,480 deal with carbon nitrogen oxygen 505 00:20:28,789 --> 00:20:25,039 hydrogen on broken down 506 00:20:31,590 --> 00:20:28,799 uh reactions and depending on the ph 507 00:20:34,470 --> 00:20:31,600 the the hydrogen balance especially may 508 00:20:35,909 --> 00:20:34,480 not be satisfied as written so then we 509 00:20:38,070 --> 00:20:35,919 would have i would then need to add 510 00:20:40,710 --> 00:20:38,080 appropriate number of hydrogens as 511 00:20:42,870 --> 00:20:40,720 needed to um the reaction while still 512 00:20:44,630 --> 00:20:42,880 making sure that the reaction is 513 00:20:47,270 --> 00:20:44,640 satisfied 514 00:20:49,590 --> 00:20:47,280 um let's see next is the thermodynamic 515 00:20:51,750 --> 00:20:49,600 calculation so all the gives and 516 00:20:53,990 --> 00:20:51,760 energies and enthalpies of formation 517 00:20:55,909 --> 00:20:54,000 were required using density functional 518 00:20:58,470 --> 00:20:55,919 theory or dft 519 00:21:00,230 --> 00:20:58,480 uh the conversions were 520 00:21:02,950 --> 00:21:00,240 the equations for the conversions were 521 00:21:05,909 --> 00:21:02,960 either derived or for the case of a 522 00:21:08,310 --> 00:21:05,919 sterification there was a closed system 523 00:21:10,950 --> 00:21:08,320 uh equation provided in the literature 524 00:21:13,590 --> 00:21:10,960 by harshi um that would allow us to 525 00:21:15,669 --> 00:21:13,600 compute uh these conversions 526 00:21:17,590 --> 00:21:15,679 and then i make a van haul 527 00:21:19,430 --> 00:21:17,600 plot where i compute equilibrium 528 00:21:21,270 --> 00:21:19,440 constants for different 529 00:21:22,630 --> 00:21:21,280 temperatures provided that the enthalpy 530 00:21:28,830 --> 00:21:22,640 is 531 00:21:31,190 --> 00:21:28,840 constant across temperature 532 00:21:33,510 --> 00:21:31,200 range so here's a list of all the 533 00:21:34,549 --> 00:21:33,520 important alpha hydroxy acids these are 534 00:21:37,110 --> 00:21:34,559 also 535 00:21:38,710 --> 00:21:37,120 a molecules you see um from 536 00:21:41,430 --> 00:21:38,720 groundbreaking experiments such as the 537 00:21:44,549 --> 00:21:41,440 miller urane experiment in the 1950s 538 00:21:45,830 --> 00:21:44,559 you see uh the glycolic acid and lactic 539 00:21:48,149 --> 00:21:45,840 acid 540 00:21:50,710 --> 00:21:48,159 and their 541 00:21:55,270 --> 00:21:50,720 their anionic forms and also in their 542 00:21:58,070 --> 00:21:56,149 so 543 00:22:00,390 --> 00:21:58,080 i want to go through you know step by 544 00:22:02,390 --> 00:22:00,400 step to see where um 545 00:22:04,870 --> 00:22:02,400 the process on how i conducted the 546 00:22:07,190 --> 00:22:04,880 research so we solve a working reaction 547 00:22:09,510 --> 00:22:07,200 we have two lactic acid residues going 548 00:22:11,510 --> 00:22:09,520 to a dimer and water 549 00:22:13,110 --> 00:22:11,520 now the reaction as you see there is not 550 00:22:15,190 --> 00:22:13,120 going to occur all the time 551 00:22:17,750 --> 00:22:15,200 for instance at ph 7 552 00:22:20,470 --> 00:22:17,760 uh the lactic acid monomer and the dinos 553 00:22:22,230 --> 00:22:20,480 is going to be in their anionic state so 554 00:22:24,549 --> 00:22:22,240 we would have to break that reaction 555 00:22:27,190 --> 00:22:24,559 down further into 556 00:22:31,190 --> 00:22:27,200 uh this reaction you see down here where 557 00:22:34,070 --> 00:22:31,200 you see x1 and x2 all the mole fractions 558 00:22:35,510 --> 00:22:34,080 of each of these association states a 559 00:22:37,830 --> 00:22:35,520 and a a 560 00:22:39,270 --> 00:22:37,840 and also i use alpha beta and gamma i 561 00:22:41,350 --> 00:22:39,280 even broke down water into that 562 00:22:43,750 --> 00:22:41,360 association states 563 00:22:46,390 --> 00:22:43,760 and using that broken down reaction i 564 00:22:47,590 --> 00:22:46,400 then do atom balances to be able to 565 00:22:49,750 --> 00:22:47,600 figure out 566 00:22:51,510 --> 00:22:49,760 what relationship exists 567 00:22:52,710 --> 00:22:51,520 um 568 00:22:54,870 --> 00:22:52,720 between 569 00:22:57,110 --> 00:22:54,880 the circumvention coefficients 570 00:22:59,990 --> 00:22:57,120 and um 571 00:23:01,750 --> 00:23:00,000 ph and pka which is what this next slide 572 00:23:03,510 --> 00:23:01,760 is going to be talking about so the 573 00:23:05,669 --> 00:23:03,520 stoichiometric coefficients that you saw 574 00:23:07,430 --> 00:23:05,679 are tied to the pka 575 00:23:10,390 --> 00:23:07,440 of each species 576 00:23:12,630 --> 00:23:10,400 and i calculate them using this uh ratio 577 00:23:13,510 --> 00:23:12,640 you see here of um a henderson house of 578 00:23:16,549 --> 00:23:13,520 back 579 00:23:19,190 --> 00:23:16,559 type of equation we have ph of solutions 580 00:23:21,669 --> 00:23:19,200 equal to pka of species 581 00:23:23,990 --> 00:23:21,679 plus the logarithm of the conjugate base 582 00:23:25,990 --> 00:23:24,000 and the acid and that ratio in the 583 00:23:27,750 --> 00:23:26,000 logarithmic term dictates what the 584 00:23:29,909 --> 00:23:27,760 coefficients are 585 00:23:31,430 --> 00:23:29,919 and the mole fraction of each of those 586 00:23:32,470 --> 00:23:31,440 association 587 00:23:35,750 --> 00:23:32,480 states 588 00:23:38,390 --> 00:23:35,760 from that ratio can be found using 589 00:23:40,630 --> 00:23:38,400 this expression uh mole fraction of 590 00:23:42,149 --> 00:23:40,640 dissociation state j of a particular 591 00:23:44,630 --> 00:23:42,159 species m 592 00:23:46,789 --> 00:23:44,640 can be found using that so by combining 593 00:23:49,510 --> 00:23:46,799 those two equations we get the result 594 00:23:52,549 --> 00:23:49,520 that the mole fraction is of each 595 00:23:54,310 --> 00:23:52,559 species in solution at a particular ph 596 00:23:56,070 --> 00:23:54,320 meaning well out of cyclical shapes is 597 00:23:58,870 --> 00:23:56,080 actually a function of both the ph 598 00:24:01,110 --> 00:23:58,880 itself and also the pka 599 00:24:03,510 --> 00:24:01,120 now some of the pkas were experimentally 600 00:24:05,430 --> 00:24:03,520 undetermined so for instance the lactoil 601 00:24:06,470 --> 00:24:05,440 lactic acid hasn't 602 00:24:07,590 --> 00:24:06,480 been 603 00:24:09,590 --> 00:24:07,600 determined 604 00:24:13,029 --> 00:24:09,600 is pka hasn't been experimentally 605 00:24:15,830 --> 00:24:13,039 undetermined so instead i use benchmarks 606 00:24:19,269 --> 00:24:15,840 of a compound that i use before i mean 607 00:24:20,870 --> 00:24:19,279 of a compound that has been 608 00:24:22,950 --> 00:24:20,880 used like 609 00:24:27,350 --> 00:24:22,960 acetyl acetyl lactic acid which had a 610 00:24:30,630 --> 00:24:27,360 pka of 2.74 or i do a small grid search 611 00:24:32,549 --> 00:24:30,640 to vary them as i um conduct 612 00:24:36,310 --> 00:24:32,559 um 613 00:24:39,990 --> 00:24:36,320 as i make my model in matlab 614 00:24:42,789 --> 00:24:40,000 here's the expanded delta g of reaction 615 00:24:44,870 --> 00:24:42,799 where we have it's just a classical 616 00:24:47,269 --> 00:24:44,880 product known as reactants and we see 617 00:24:49,510 --> 00:24:47,279 the mole fractions you can consider the 618 00:24:50,789 --> 00:24:49,520 mole fractions of each species as a 619 00:24:53,190 --> 00:24:50,799 weight 620 00:24:56,390 --> 00:24:53,200 of uh 621 00:24:57,990 --> 00:24:56,400 on the delta g of formation of these uh 622 00:25:00,870 --> 00:24:58,000 of all these species which are found 623 00:25:02,870 --> 00:25:00,880 from dft and because delta h is a state 624 00:25:04,630 --> 00:25:02,880 function we can use the exact same 625 00:25:06,950 --> 00:25:04,640 formulation except instead of delta g we 626 00:25:10,310 --> 00:25:06,960 use those 627 00:25:12,870 --> 00:25:10,320 so if we combine that we get a graph 628 00:25:15,029 --> 00:25:12,880 that looks like this so we though so 629 00:25:17,510 --> 00:25:15,039 here we see the p the delta g of 630 00:25:18,710 --> 00:25:17,520 formation as a function of ph 631 00:25:21,269 --> 00:25:18,720 um 632 00:25:24,149 --> 00:25:21,279 for the oligomerization of lactic acid 633 00:25:25,110 --> 00:25:24,159 just for monomer to dimer and we can see 634 00:25:29,590 --> 00:25:25,120 that 635 00:25:31,669 --> 00:25:29,600 pka does play a major factor here um 636 00:25:36,630 --> 00:25:31,679 and we can see that around 637 00:25:38,230 --> 00:25:36,640 ph of 3.7 3.8 if the pka is around three 638 00:25:41,029 --> 00:25:38,240 we can see that it's at its most 639 00:25:43,990 --> 00:25:41,039 spontaneous at around that point 640 00:25:47,510 --> 00:25:44,000 but um there are other places where 641 00:25:49,190 --> 00:25:47,520 delta g is very highly unfavorable but 642 00:25:52,549 --> 00:25:49,200 there are certain 643 00:25:55,510 --> 00:25:52,559 uh ph ranges where this reaction is 644 00:25:57,830 --> 00:25:55,520 naturally spontaneous 645 00:25:59,190 --> 00:25:57,840 and here's a van hof plot 646 00:26:01,750 --> 00:25:59,200 and we can see here that the 647 00:26:04,950 --> 00:26:01,760 temperatures are that the profiles of 648 00:26:07,430 --> 00:26:04,960 the delta g are very tightly packed uh 649 00:26:10,470 --> 00:26:07,440 this suggests that it does the thermal 650 00:26:12,950 --> 00:26:10,480 neutrality does hold 651 00:26:16,710 --> 00:26:12,960 temperature does play a small role but 652 00:26:19,029 --> 00:26:16,720 not as major role as the pkas 653 00:26:22,470 --> 00:26:19,039 and then um here we talk about the 654 00:26:24,950 --> 00:26:22,480 conversions so the color contours 655 00:26:26,470 --> 00:26:24,960 are the conversions of lactic acid and 656 00:26:28,710 --> 00:26:26,480 these conversions were computed using 657 00:26:29,750 --> 00:26:28,720 this equation you see to your left from 658 00:26:32,230 --> 00:26:29,760 hershey 659 00:26:34,950 --> 00:26:32,240 where we use the equilibrium constant 660 00:26:37,350 --> 00:26:34,960 uh the initial water content w zero and 661 00:26:39,750 --> 00:26:37,360 then lambda one zero which 662 00:26:42,470 --> 00:26:39,760 harshi describes as the first moment of 663 00:26:44,549 --> 00:26:42,480 monomer uh so basically it's just saying 664 00:26:45,909 --> 00:26:44,559 how much initial monomer do we have in 665 00:26:48,549 --> 00:26:45,919 solution 666 00:26:50,950 --> 00:26:48,559 and this red line you see here is from 667 00:26:55,269 --> 00:26:50,960 an author named holton who has done ph 668 00:26:57,830 --> 00:26:55,279 and thermal work on poly lactic acid um 669 00:27:00,870 --> 00:26:57,840 um acidification at room temperature but 670 00:27:02,870 --> 00:27:00,880 he didn't um report conversion data but 671 00:27:05,269 --> 00:27:02,880 i did just i just bought it but he did 672 00:27:06,870 --> 00:27:05,279 have ph and w0 so i was able to plot 673 00:27:11,510 --> 00:27:06,880 that 674 00:27:13,830 --> 00:27:11,520 dry down 675 00:27:15,029 --> 00:27:13,840 though while holding ph constant we can 676 00:27:18,070 --> 00:27:15,039 see that 677 00:27:22,950 --> 00:27:18,080 conversions do increase as we would 678 00:27:25,430 --> 00:27:22,960 expect but we can see that we can also 679 00:27:27,590 --> 00:27:25,440 increase ph at the same water content by 680 00:27:30,389 --> 00:27:27,600 decreasing um ph 681 00:27:32,549 --> 00:27:30,399 by increasing the yield of 682 00:27:35,669 --> 00:27:32,559 uh 683 00:27:37,590 --> 00:27:35,679 longer ligaments of lactic acid 684 00:27:39,590 --> 00:27:37,600 so conclusion we can see that the poly 685 00:27:42,070 --> 00:27:39,600 condensation thermodynamics is driven by 686 00:27:43,430 --> 00:27:42,080 both pka and the removal of water from 687 00:27:45,830 --> 00:27:43,440 the system 688 00:27:48,710 --> 00:27:45,840 um polycondensation could proceed from 689 00:27:51,190 --> 00:27:48,720 both neutron and ionic states thanks to 690 00:27:52,789 --> 00:27:51,200 the atom balances and the ph and pka 691 00:27:57,110 --> 00:27:52,799 considerations 692 00:27:59,750 --> 00:27:57,990 okay 693 00:28:01,990 --> 00:27:59,760 kairat and even though i didn't say it 694 00:28:03,830 --> 00:28:02,000 in position but chirality whether the 695 00:28:05,909 --> 00:28:03,840 diastereomers do play a minor role in 696 00:28:07,430 --> 00:28:05,919 thermodynamic driving forces 697 00:28:09,029 --> 00:28:07,440 and dissociation states were critical 698 00:28:10,710 --> 00:28:09,039 and understanding the ester bond leakage 699 00:28:12,950 --> 00:28:10,720 thermo 700 00:28:14,630 --> 00:28:12,960 and uh future steps i was going to work 701 00:28:16,710 --> 00:28:14,640 on the second part of the coin which is 702 00:28:20,070 --> 00:28:16,720 about depth peptide 703 00:28:22,230 --> 00:28:20,080 exchange swapping an estrophon and i'm 704 00:28:24,870 --> 00:28:22,240 doing work with these a similar 705 00:28:26,549 --> 00:28:24,880 thermodynamic analysis that reaction 706 00:28:28,310 --> 00:28:26,559 so i want to say thank you very much i 707 00:28:29,909 --> 00:28:28,320 want to thank my advisors dr martha 708 00:28:31,830 --> 00:28:29,919 grofer and dr charles leota for 709 00:28:33,510 --> 00:28:31,840 supporting me and dr moran frankel 710 00:28:35,029 --> 00:28:33,520 penner and dr j forsyth for supporting 711 00:28:37,590 --> 00:28:35,039 me throughout my 712 00:28:41,029 --> 00:28:37,600 um journey through my phd at my email 713 00:28:42,149 --> 00:28:41,039 you can see casemill427 gotech.edu if 714 00:28:43,510 --> 00:28:42,159 you want to contact me for more 715 00:28:45,410 --> 00:28:43,520 questions 716 00:28:52,230 --> 00:28:45,420 thank you very much 717 00:29:01,830 --> 00:28:52,240 [Applause] 718 00:29:07,430 --> 00:29:04,710 thanks for the nice talk um do you 719 00:29:10,830 --> 00:29:07,440 also account for reverse reactions where 720 00:29:13,510 --> 00:29:10,840 you hydrolyze the 721 00:29:15,750 --> 00:29:13,520 products i'm sorry can you um i couldn't 722 00:29:18,070 --> 00:29:15,760 hear you i'm sorry yes i was just 723 00:29:19,830 --> 00:29:18,080 wondering if you uh consider the 724 00:29:22,230 --> 00:29:19,840 hydrolysis of your products if you 725 00:29:25,990 --> 00:29:22,240 consider the reverse reactions or are 726 00:29:31,909 --> 00:29:26,000 they uh fine to neglect 727 00:29:37,830 --> 00:29:35,269 i did include reversibility and um 728 00:29:39,750 --> 00:29:37,840 in my model i did take into 729 00:29:42,470 --> 00:29:39,760 consideration the 730 00:29:44,470 --> 00:29:42,480 equilibrium constant of products over 731 00:29:46,070 --> 00:29:44,480 reactants but in terms of whether it 732 00:29:48,710 --> 00:29:46,080 mattered 733 00:29:50,310 --> 00:29:48,720 a lot i'm not 734 00:29:53,430 --> 00:29:50,320 entirely sure 735 00:29:55,750 --> 00:29:53,440 about that um 736 00:29:58,389 --> 00:29:55,760 so um 737 00:30:01,029 --> 00:29:58,399 i'll have to get i i can get back to you 738 00:30:03,029 --> 00:30:01,039 on um i can get back to you on that if 739 00:30:04,549 --> 00:30:03,039 you need more detail on that but i'm not 740 00:30:07,510 --> 00:30:04,559 entirely 741 00:30:09,190 --> 00:30:07,520 i can't i'm at all time processing that 742 00:30:11,029 --> 00:30:09,200 right 743 00:30:15,029 --> 00:30:11,039 okay thanks 744 00:30:15,039 --> 00:30:19,430 any other questions 745 00:30:19,440 --> 00:30:29,430 if not let's thank our speaker 746 00:30:33,830 --> 00:30:32,070 so our next talk has been is withdrawn 747 00:30:35,750 --> 00:30:33,840 and so in order to stay on time for the 748 00:30:37,909 --> 00:30:35,760 future talks we'll start with our next 749 00:44:44,390 --> 00:30:37,919 speaker at 3 45 so we'll take a short 750 00:44:47,750 --> 00:44:46,230 nice starting one 751 00:44:58,630 --> 00:44:47,760 i guess whenever i'm ready maybe next 752 00:45:04,870 --> 00:45:00,390 all right we're gonna get started again 753 00:45:09,670 --> 00:45:07,109 hi everyone my name is laura rodriguez 754 00:45:11,589 --> 00:45:09,680 and i am a jpl postdoc and today i'm 755 00:45:13,990 --> 00:45:11,599 going to be talking about my research 756 00:45:15,990 --> 00:45:14,000 which is focused on studying conditions 757 00:45:17,910 --> 00:45:16,000 that are conducive for phosphorylating 758 00:45:20,870 --> 00:45:17,920 or adding a phosphate group onto 759 00:45:23,109 --> 00:45:20,880 organics and aqueous solutions 760 00:45:24,950 --> 00:45:23,119 so phosphorus is really important for 761 00:45:26,470 --> 00:45:24,960 life all life on earth today and it's 762 00:45:28,710 --> 00:45:26,480 thought to have been critical for the 763 00:45:30,550 --> 00:45:28,720 origins of life on the early earth 764 00:45:32,470 --> 00:45:30,560 however in its most common form as 765 00:45:33,750 --> 00:45:32,480 phosphate 766 00:45:35,510 --> 00:45:33,760 it would have been difficult to 767 00:45:38,230 --> 00:45:35,520 accumulate in the oceans and that's 768 00:45:39,990 --> 00:45:38,240 because as shown in this diagram here 769 00:45:42,150 --> 00:45:40,000 look at my math shows 770 00:45:44,470 --> 00:45:42,160 under a wide range of ph from acidic 771 00:45:46,630 --> 00:45:44,480 solutions to alkaline conditions you 772 00:45:48,150 --> 00:45:46,640 have to contend with common cations 773 00:45:51,670 --> 00:45:48,160 chelating the phosphate and 774 00:45:53,510 --> 00:45:51,680 precipitating out as insoluble minerals 775 00:45:55,589 --> 00:45:53,520 in addition to that phosphorylating is 776 00:45:57,589 --> 00:45:55,599 thermodynamically not favorable under 777 00:45:59,670 --> 00:45:57,599 aqueous conditions and that's because 778 00:46:01,510 --> 00:45:59,680 it's a condensation reaction which means 779 00:46:03,990 --> 00:46:01,520 that it produces water 780 00:46:05,750 --> 00:46:04,000 as one of the products and when you are 781 00:46:07,030 --> 00:46:05,760 in water you're essentially surrounded 782 00:46:09,430 --> 00:46:07,040 by one of the products and so 783 00:46:13,030 --> 00:46:09,440 equilibrium is pushed towards back 784 00:46:15,270 --> 00:46:13,040 back towards the reactants 785 00:46:18,309 --> 00:46:15,280 there are um mechanisms to get around 786 00:46:19,670 --> 00:46:18,319 that issue if you do the reaction in a 787 00:46:21,589 --> 00:46:19,680 non-aqueous solvents or 788 00:46:23,349 --> 00:46:21,599 semihydrosolvents 789 00:46:25,190 --> 00:46:23,359 but for the purposes of this work i was 790 00:46:27,670 --> 00:46:25,200 interested in focusing on aqueous 791 00:46:29,910 --> 00:46:27,680 conditions and that's because this is um 792 00:46:31,270 --> 00:46:29,920 more representative of the kind of 793 00:46:33,589 --> 00:46:31,280 solutions you would encounter in the 794 00:46:35,750 --> 00:46:33,599 deep sea or on the early earth as well 795 00:46:37,589 --> 00:46:35,760 as the oceans of other worlds such as 796 00:46:39,990 --> 00:46:37,599 enceladus and europa 797 00:46:41,990 --> 00:46:40,000 so a potential workaround instead is 798 00:46:44,870 --> 00:46:42,000 phosphite which is a reduced form of 799 00:46:47,030 --> 00:46:44,880 phosphorus it's hpo3 and you can 800 00:46:49,670 --> 00:46:47,040 actually get phosphite from phosphate by 801 00:46:51,910 --> 00:46:49,680 reducing heating with ferrous minerals 802 00:46:53,990 --> 00:46:51,920 or through lightning strikes 803 00:46:55,910 --> 00:46:54,000 and phosphate unlike phosphate is 804 00:46:57,750 --> 00:46:55,920 actually much more soluble in the water 805 00:46:59,109 --> 00:46:57,760 so you can overcome that solubility 806 00:47:00,309 --> 00:46:59,119 problem 807 00:47:02,550 --> 00:47:00,319 in addition 808 00:47:04,870 --> 00:47:02,560 pasek and colleagues in 2008 showed him 809 00:47:07,270 --> 00:47:04,880 a way to get around the thermodynamic 810 00:47:09,109 --> 00:47:07,280 problem by coupling phosphide oxidation 811 00:47:11,190 --> 00:47:09,119 with fenton chemistry to produce 812 00:47:13,990 --> 00:47:11,200 phosphorylating compounds 813 00:47:15,910 --> 00:47:14,000 so bend chemistry is just the oxidation 814 00:47:17,910 --> 00:47:15,920 of ferrous iron shown in the first line 815 00:47:20,870 --> 00:47:17,920 here with a strong oxidant like hydrogen 816 00:47:23,030 --> 00:47:20,880 peroxide and you can produce ferric iron 817 00:47:25,109 --> 00:47:23,040 as well as a hydroxyl radical and the 818 00:47:27,190 --> 00:47:25,119 hydroxyl radical can then go on to react 819 00:47:28,309 --> 00:47:27,200 with the phosphite producing a phosphite 820 00:47:30,230 --> 00:47:28,319 radical 821 00:47:31,510 --> 00:47:30,240 and then you can form phosphates and 822 00:47:33,270 --> 00:47:31,520 then you can have phosphite and 823 00:47:35,470 --> 00:47:33,280 phosphate radicals combine to form 824 00:47:37,349 --> 00:47:35,480 pyrophosphate triphosphate and 825 00:47:39,030 --> 00:47:37,359 trimetaphosphate and these are all 826 00:47:40,710 --> 00:47:39,040 phosphorylating agents which means they 827 00:47:43,349 --> 00:47:40,720 are readily give up their phosphate 828 00:47:45,109 --> 00:47:43,359 groups onto organic compounds 829 00:47:46,069 --> 00:47:45,119 and so now we have actually a new 830 00:47:47,670 --> 00:47:46,079 problem 831 00:47:50,390 --> 00:47:47,680 which is this reaction actually 832 00:47:52,549 --> 00:47:50,400 generates hydroxyl radicals that can 833 00:47:54,150 --> 00:47:52,559 react with organics and actually destroy 834 00:47:56,069 --> 00:47:54,160 any organic you want to phosphorylate in 835 00:47:58,309 --> 00:47:56,079 the water and so that comes to my 836 00:48:00,069 --> 00:47:58,319 research where i am interested in 837 00:48:01,349 --> 00:48:00,079 looking at condition spaces where you 838 00:48:03,510 --> 00:48:01,359 can generate a lot of these 839 00:48:05,750 --> 00:48:03,520 polyphosphates while minimizing organic 840 00:48:07,750 --> 00:48:05,760 degradation and typically these 841 00:48:10,230 --> 00:48:07,760 reactions are done with dissolved iron 842 00:48:12,230 --> 00:48:10,240 at around ph4 and so i was interested in 843 00:48:13,430 --> 00:48:12,240 doing the reactions with manganese and 844 00:48:16,309 --> 00:48:13,440 that's because manganese is an 845 00:48:18,309 --> 00:48:16,319 antioxidant as well as at higher ph's 846 00:48:20,870 --> 00:48:18,319 and that's because not only are those 847 00:48:23,190 --> 00:48:20,880 higher ph's more relevant for 848 00:48:25,270 --> 00:48:23,200 earth's early oceans but also because at 849 00:48:27,670 --> 00:48:25,280 higher ph iron and manganese crash out 850 00:48:29,910 --> 00:48:27,680 to form oxyhydroxide minerals which 851 00:48:31,670 --> 00:48:29,920 themselves could potentially provide an 852 00:48:34,309 --> 00:48:31,680 avenue for preserving the organic 853 00:48:36,549 --> 00:48:34,319 compounds 854 00:48:38,549 --> 00:48:36,559 so for this work i generated my own 855 00:48:40,870 --> 00:48:38,559 minerals using ferrous chloride or 856 00:48:43,670 --> 00:48:40,880 manganese chloride and titrating with 857 00:48:45,910 --> 00:48:43,680 sodium hydroxide to either ph five six 858 00:48:47,750 --> 00:48:45,920 point five or eight and then i added a 859 00:48:49,990 --> 00:48:47,760 solution of phosphate glycerol also 860 00:48:51,030 --> 00:48:50,000 titrated to the corresponding ph and 861 00:48:53,829 --> 00:48:51,040 then 862 00:48:56,390 --> 00:48:53,839 oxidized it last with hydrogen peroxide 863 00:48:58,790 --> 00:48:56,400 at 500 millimolar all these reactions 864 00:49:01,109 --> 00:48:58,800 were done under anaerobic conditions and 865 00:49:02,870 --> 00:49:01,119 the results were anal and the reactions 866 00:49:07,750 --> 00:49:02,880 were analyzed using nuclear magnetic 867 00:49:12,309 --> 00:49:10,470 so shown here is 31 phosphorus nmr so 868 00:49:14,470 --> 00:49:12,319 each of these peaks corresponds to a 869 00:49:16,470 --> 00:49:14,480 phosphorous species so pa is 870 00:49:18,549 --> 00:49:16,480 phosphonoacetic acid that's the standard 871 00:49:20,710 --> 00:49:18,559 we spiked in 872 00:49:22,710 --> 00:49:20,720 hpo3 is our starting phosphite and you 873 00:49:25,349 --> 00:49:22,720 can see there are two products phosphate 874 00:49:27,349 --> 00:49:25,359 and pyrophosphate and so this goes to 875 00:49:29,589 --> 00:49:27,359 show this reaction was done at ph 8 at 876 00:49:31,030 --> 00:49:29,599 room temperature and so at this ph iron 877 00:49:33,430 --> 00:49:31,040 is mostly present in the mineral 878 00:49:35,030 --> 00:49:33,440 oxyhydroxide and so this is just showing 879 00:49:38,150 --> 00:49:35,040 that the mineral is capable of 880 00:49:39,589 --> 00:49:38,160 facilitating this reaction 881 00:49:41,510 --> 00:49:39,599 we also looked at it at a higher 882 00:49:42,950 --> 00:49:41,520 temperature so in this case 70c because 883 00:49:44,470 --> 00:49:42,960 we wanted to see if that could really 884 00:49:46,710 --> 00:49:44,480 facilitate the formation of 885 00:49:50,470 --> 00:49:46,720 pyrophosphate but what we found is that 886 00:49:53,510 --> 00:49:50,480 it didn't actually increase the yield of 887 00:49:55,430 --> 00:49:53,520 the yield of phosphite oxidation and 888 00:49:57,270 --> 00:49:55,440 instead decreased the amount of 889 00:49:59,589 --> 00:49:57,280 pyrophosphate present and that's because 890 00:50:00,870 --> 00:49:59,599 pyrophosphate is actually unstable under 891 00:50:03,430 --> 00:50:00,880 high temperature so it was just 892 00:50:05,349 --> 00:50:03,440 hydrolyzing back to phosphate so moving 893 00:50:08,230 --> 00:50:05,359 forward we decided to do our reactions 894 00:50:09,750 --> 00:50:08,240 at room temperature 895 00:50:11,670 --> 00:50:09,760 what this diagram is showing is a 896 00:50:13,349 --> 00:50:11,680 comparison over time of the amount of 897 00:50:15,030 --> 00:50:13,359 phosphite that's oxidized over the 898 00:50:17,829 --> 00:50:15,040 course of a month 899 00:50:19,910 --> 00:50:17,839 when we did the reactions at ph 5 6.5 or 900 00:50:21,190 --> 00:50:19,920 8. so you can see here that within 24 901 00:50:22,549 --> 00:50:21,200 hours the reaction is essentially 902 00:50:25,589 --> 00:50:22,559 complete 903 00:50:27,190 --> 00:50:25,599 under all conditions and in general the 904 00:50:30,069 --> 00:50:27,200 reaction yields are pretty high so 905 00:50:31,750 --> 00:50:30,079 between 75 to like 95 percent um 906 00:50:33,829 --> 00:50:31,760 dissolved iron was 907 00:50:35,910 --> 00:50:33,839 uh promoted the reaction more than when 908 00:50:38,069 --> 00:50:35,920 the iron is trapped in the mineral 909 00:50:40,710 --> 00:50:38,079 but overall we had good yields even with 910 00:50:44,470 --> 00:50:40,720 the mineral and in general pyrophosphate 911 00:50:45,990 --> 00:50:44,480 formation was between 10 to 18 912 00:50:48,069 --> 00:50:46,000 so then we decided to look to see what 913 00:50:49,829 --> 00:50:48,079 was happening to our organic in solution 914 00:50:51,109 --> 00:50:49,839 in this case we used glycerol and that's 915 00:50:52,710 --> 00:50:51,119 because if you can phosphorylate 916 00:50:54,950 --> 00:50:52,720 glycerol that's an important component 917 00:50:57,270 --> 00:50:54,960 for phospholipids 918 00:51:00,630 --> 00:50:57,280 and what this top graph is showing here 919 00:51:02,870 --> 00:51:00,640 a top plot is a proton nmr so we have 920 00:51:04,470 --> 00:51:02,880 our phosphonoacetic acid our glycerol 921 00:51:05,910 --> 00:51:04,480 and our starting phosphate and this is 922 00:51:08,230 --> 00:51:05,920 just showing that with the mineral the 923 00:51:09,910 --> 00:51:08,240 glycerol is stable but as soon as we add 924 00:51:12,150 --> 00:51:09,920 peroxide and get the fenton chemistry 925 00:51:14,150 --> 00:51:12,160 going it degrades and forms all of these 926 00:51:15,829 --> 00:51:14,160 different peaks this large peak here 927 00:51:17,910 --> 00:51:15,839 actually correspond corresponds to 928 00:51:19,829 --> 00:51:17,920 formate and so what this is showing is 929 00:51:21,990 --> 00:51:19,839 that even with the mineral we get 930 00:51:24,390 --> 00:51:22,000 glycerol oxidation so it's not it isn't 931 00:51:26,870 --> 00:51:24,400 able to prevent oxidation of the organic 932 00:51:29,190 --> 00:51:26,880 compound what the diagram showing over 933 00:51:30,790 --> 00:51:29,200 here is uh it just i was just showing 934 00:51:32,870 --> 00:51:30,800 that there's been a lot of work looking 935 00:51:34,309 --> 00:51:32,880 at glycerol oxidation with hydroxyl 936 00:51:37,030 --> 00:51:34,319 radicals so here are just some of the 937 00:51:39,109 --> 00:51:37,040 products you would expect to find 938 00:51:40,549 --> 00:51:39,119 so even though it can't prevent glycerol 939 00:51:42,390 --> 00:51:40,559 oxidation i wanted to see how it 940 00:51:44,309 --> 00:51:42,400 compared to 941 00:51:45,829 --> 00:51:44,319 how much glycerol was oxidized under the 942 00:51:48,069 --> 00:51:45,839 other conditions so that is what this 943 00:51:49,670 --> 00:51:48,079 plot is showing here the percentage of 944 00:51:51,030 --> 00:51:49,680 glycerol oxidation over time over the 945 00:51:54,390 --> 00:51:51,040 course of a month 946 00:51:56,470 --> 00:51:54,400 what you can see is as expected at ph 5 947 00:51:58,390 --> 00:51:56,480 more glycerol is oxidized compared to ph 948 00:52:00,790 --> 00:51:58,400 6.5 and 8. so that's not surprising 949 00:52:02,790 --> 00:52:00,800 considering that more phosphite was also 950 00:52:04,150 --> 00:52:02,800 oxidized under these conditions 951 00:52:05,190 --> 00:52:04,160 and in fact it's about a one-to-one 952 00:52:07,990 --> 00:52:05,200 ratio 953 00:52:10,069 --> 00:52:08,000 um intriguingly the ph 6.5 we actually 954 00:52:12,150 --> 00:52:10,079 have proportionally more glycerol being 955 00:52:15,030 --> 00:52:12,160 oxidized than we did have phosphite 956 00:52:16,309 --> 00:52:15,040 being oxidized um and so it was actually 957 00:52:19,270 --> 00:52:16,319 a little bit more than a one-to-one 958 00:52:21,510 --> 00:52:19,280 ratio and then um the opposite is true 959 00:52:23,190 --> 00:52:21,520 for ph eight where we had 960 00:52:24,790 --> 00:52:23,200 about seven if you recall about 75 961 00:52:27,990 --> 00:52:24,800 percent of the phosphite was being 962 00:52:29,670 --> 00:52:28,000 oxidized and um the significantly less 963 00:52:31,589 --> 00:52:29,680 glycerol is oxidized so it's a less than 964 00:52:33,589 --> 00:52:31,599 one to one ratio so although glycerol 965 00:52:36,150 --> 00:52:33,599 still oxidized under these conditions 966 00:52:39,510 --> 00:52:36,160 it's somewhat the oxidation is somewhat 967 00:52:42,390 --> 00:52:39,520 inhibited at pha 968 00:52:43,910 --> 00:52:42,400 so then if we switch gears to manganese 969 00:52:45,829 --> 00:52:43,920 all three of these spectra are 970 00:52:49,270 --> 00:52:45,839 phosphorous nmr of the manganese 971 00:52:50,870 --> 00:52:49,280 reactions at ph 5 ph 6.5 and ph 8 over 972 00:52:53,030 --> 00:52:50,880 the course of a month 973 00:52:55,109 --> 00:52:53,040 and what you can see here 974 00:52:56,390 --> 00:52:55,119 is a phosphate peak is present in all of 975 00:52:58,390 --> 00:52:56,400 them so that's just showing that 976 00:53:00,470 --> 00:52:58,400 manganese can facilitate this kind of 977 00:53:02,230 --> 00:53:00,480 chemistry under all of the conditions so 978 00:53:04,470 --> 00:53:02,240 whether dissolved or whether present as 979 00:53:06,549 --> 00:53:04,480 an oxyhydroxide mineral 980 00:53:08,630 --> 00:53:06,559 we only actually observed pyrophosphate 981 00:53:10,309 --> 00:53:08,640 you can see this trace peak here 982 00:53:11,990 --> 00:53:10,319 in the des when it was present as a 983 00:53:14,390 --> 00:53:12,000 dissolved metal 984 00:53:16,790 --> 00:53:14,400 in fact the reaction is just very very 985 00:53:18,470 --> 00:53:16,800 slow even at ph five 986 00:53:20,230 --> 00:53:18,480 but it's especially slow when it is 987 00:53:22,230 --> 00:53:20,240 trapped as an oxyhydroxide mineral as 988 00:53:24,230 --> 00:53:22,240 you can see by the overall yield shown 989 00:53:25,829 --> 00:53:24,240 here 990 00:53:28,630 --> 00:53:25,839 looking at the 991 00:53:32,150 --> 00:53:28,640 proton nmr spectra to see how glycerol 992 00:53:34,870 --> 00:53:32,160 behaved we found so the top spectra is 993 00:53:37,349 --> 00:53:34,880 the reaction with manganese at ph 5 994 00:53:39,510 --> 00:53:37,359 after 24 hours so we had about 8 995 00:53:42,390 --> 00:53:39,520 phosphite oxidized at that time point 996 00:53:44,710 --> 00:53:42,400 and the bottom is at ph 6.5 after the 997 00:53:46,630 --> 00:53:44,720 course of a month so about half of the 998 00:53:47,430 --> 00:53:46,640 amount of phosphite was oxidized at this 999 00:53:48,790 --> 00:53:47,440 point 1000 00:53:51,030 --> 00:53:48,800 and what you can see here on the top 1001 00:53:53,030 --> 00:53:51,040 part is that when manganese is dissolved 1002 00:53:54,950 --> 00:53:53,040 the glycerol still oxidizes so we see a 1003 00:53:57,109 --> 00:53:54,960 really large formate peak here so it 1004 00:53:59,109 --> 00:53:57,119 didn't prevent oxidation but when it's 1005 00:54:01,030 --> 00:53:59,119 present as an oxyhydroxide mineral we 1006 00:54:03,109 --> 00:54:01,040 did not observe any oxidation of the 1007 00:54:05,190 --> 00:54:03,119 glycerol and that was surprising because 1008 00:54:07,510 --> 00:54:05,200 even though it was relatively 1009 00:54:09,270 --> 00:54:07,520 low yields of a phosphite that was 1010 00:54:11,030 --> 00:54:09,280 oxidized you would still expect to see 1011 00:54:14,390 --> 00:54:11,040 at least a small trace peak of the 1012 00:54:16,069 --> 00:54:14,400 format but we did not see anything 1013 00:54:17,910 --> 00:54:16,079 so that seems to suggest that maybe this 1014 00:54:19,910 --> 00:54:17,920 is an avenue for generating 1015 00:54:22,790 --> 00:54:19,920 polyphosphates while minimizing organic 1016 00:54:25,349 --> 00:54:22,800 degradation and in fact previous work 1017 00:54:27,270 --> 00:54:25,359 has found that when looking at the 1018 00:54:29,670 --> 00:54:27,280 fenton chemistry facilitated by 1019 00:54:30,790 --> 00:54:29,680 manganese either dissolved or at ph 1020 00:54:33,190 --> 00:54:30,800 greater than six where it is 1021 00:54:35,190 --> 00:54:33,200 precipitated out it uh proceeds through 1022 00:54:36,789 --> 00:54:35,200 two different mechanisms so when it's 1023 00:54:39,190 --> 00:54:36,799 dissolved it's like iron it produces 1024 00:54:41,670 --> 00:54:39,200 hydroxyl radicals but at ph greater than 1025 00:54:43,670 --> 00:54:41,680 six it produces reducing radicals that 1026 00:54:45,430 --> 00:54:43,680 actually react with organics differently 1027 00:54:47,510 --> 00:54:45,440 in this case perhaps those reducing 1028 00:54:49,109 --> 00:54:47,520 radicals are not reacting with the 1029 00:54:50,789 --> 00:54:49,119 glycerol 1030 00:54:53,109 --> 00:54:50,799 so while this is a promising avenue 1031 00:54:55,030 --> 00:54:53,119 these reactions are very very slow 1032 00:54:56,710 --> 00:54:55,040 and so we would ideally like to run them 1033 00:54:59,990 --> 00:54:56,720 for much longer than a month to actually 1034 00:55:02,309 --> 00:55:00,000 see if this trend holds true when more 1035 00:55:04,069 --> 00:55:02,319 phosphite is actually oxidized 1036 00:55:05,910 --> 00:55:04,079 but that did lead us to question whether 1037 00:55:07,510 --> 00:55:05,920 mixed iron manganese minerals could be a 1038 00:55:08,950 --> 00:55:07,520 good avenue for 1039 00:55:11,030 --> 00:55:08,960 maximizing 1040 00:55:14,150 --> 00:55:11,040 this kind of reaction so what this is 1041 00:55:15,990 --> 00:55:14,160 showing is a range of iron and manganese 1042 00:55:18,789 --> 00:55:16,000 at different ratios and as predicted you 1043 00:55:22,150 --> 00:55:18,799 can see that at 100 iron we had the most 1044 00:55:23,510 --> 00:55:22,160 oxidized and that it decreases with iron 1045 00:55:26,549 --> 00:55:23,520 and then when looking at the amount of 1046 00:55:29,109 --> 00:55:26,559 organic that's oxidized you can see 1047 00:55:31,030 --> 00:55:29,119 100 iron that a lot of the glycerol was 1048 00:55:33,670 --> 00:55:31,040 oxidized as predicted and we do see that 1049 00:55:35,829 --> 00:55:33,680 trace formate peak and other reactions 1050 00:55:37,750 --> 00:55:35,839 but really what really intrigued me is 1051 00:55:39,190 --> 00:55:37,760 that the glycerol peak just disappeared 1052 00:55:41,829 --> 00:55:39,200 all together when we had mixed iron 1053 00:55:43,430 --> 00:55:41,839 manganese minerals which was strange um 1054 00:55:44,549 --> 00:55:43,440 i'm not quite sure what happened to the 1055 00:55:46,950 --> 00:55:44,559 glycerol 1056 00:55:48,789 --> 00:55:46,960 we did have controls so we did run it 1057 00:55:50,069 --> 00:55:48,799 without the peroxide and the glycerol 1058 00:55:51,349 --> 00:55:50,079 was stable 1059 00:55:53,030 --> 00:55:51,359 so i don't think it's absorbing to the 1060 00:55:54,390 --> 00:55:53,040 mineral unless it only absorbs to the 1061 00:55:56,069 --> 00:55:54,400 oxidized mineral but that would be 1062 00:55:57,270 --> 00:55:56,079 surprising giving the structure of 1063 00:55:59,109 --> 00:55:57,280 glycerol 1064 00:56:01,430 --> 00:55:59,119 and if we zoom here on the formate peak 1065 00:56:03,990 --> 00:56:01,440 you do see that trace formate peak 1066 00:56:05,190 --> 00:56:04,000 in the reactions and so 1067 00:56:06,710 --> 00:56:05,200 it's actually a lot less than you would 1068 00:56:09,190 --> 00:56:06,720 expect considering how much phosphite 1069 00:56:12,150 --> 00:56:09,200 was oxidized so no matter what the 1070 00:56:14,230 --> 00:56:12,160 oxidation of glycerol seems to be 1071 00:56:16,390 --> 00:56:14,240 inhibited but where it went remains 1072 00:56:19,829 --> 00:56:16,400 uncertain and so these are the overall 1073 00:56:21,589 --> 00:56:19,839 conclusions and i would like to thank my 1074 00:56:23,829 --> 00:56:21,599 advisor dr lori barge as well as my 1075 00:56:25,670 --> 00:56:23,839 other co-authors dr david vanderveld and 1076 00:56:28,130 --> 00:56:25,680 dr matthew pasek and thank you all for 1077 00:56:33,349 --> 00:56:28,140 your time and attention 1078 00:56:33,359 --> 00:56:46,390 time for a couple of questions 1079 00:56:50,870 --> 00:56:49,190 hi laura matt hazen usf um 1080 00:56:52,630 --> 00:56:50,880 so i'm curious where your glossary went 1081 00:56:54,549 --> 00:56:52,640 then i mean is there 1082 00:56:56,309 --> 00:56:54,559 do you have any i guess you have some 1083 00:56:57,589 --> 00:56:56,319 amount of speculation but anything 1084 00:56:59,190 --> 00:56:57,599 specific 1085 00:57:01,589 --> 00:56:59,200 about the glycerol yeah 1086 00:57:03,910 --> 00:57:01,599 yeah um so i was thinking that 1087 00:57:05,589 --> 00:57:03,920 perhaps that since it is a different 1088 00:57:06,549 --> 00:57:05,599 radical that forms with the manganese 1089 00:57:08,309 --> 00:57:06,559 when it's 1090 00:57:10,150 --> 00:57:08,319 crashed out as a precipitate that that 1091 00:57:12,390 --> 00:57:10,160 different radical is 1092 00:57:13,990 --> 00:57:12,400 reacting with the glycerol and the 1093 00:57:15,910 --> 00:57:14,000 reason that you don't see that with just 1094 00:57:18,150 --> 00:57:15,920 manganese is perhaps having that iron 1095 00:57:20,870 --> 00:57:18,160 there really promotes that reaction as 1096 00:57:22,630 --> 00:57:20,880 well um but at this point it's kind of 1097 00:57:24,710 --> 00:57:22,640 speculation i just find it i just 1098 00:57:26,630 --> 00:57:24,720 wouldn't expect it to actually absorb to 1099 00:57:28,710 --> 00:57:26,640 the oxyhydroxide mineral that doesn't 1100 00:57:30,710 --> 00:57:28,720 seem likely but we will test that just 1101 00:57:32,950 --> 00:57:30,720 to make sure 1102 00:57:33,750 --> 00:57:32,960 while we're at it do you have it i'm 1103 00:57:35,829 --> 00:57:33,760 here 1104 00:57:37,829 --> 00:57:35,839 do you happen to know what the 1105 00:57:38,950 --> 00:57:37,839 oxidation states that were sampled by 1106 00:57:40,710 --> 00:57:38,960 the manganese i mean you were 1107 00:57:43,349 --> 00:57:40,720 introducing it manganese three i'm 1108 00:57:45,829 --> 00:57:43,359 assuming did you see manganese iv i'm 1109 00:57:48,630 --> 00:57:45,839 assuming you never saw manganese seven 1110 00:57:50,230 --> 00:57:48,640 but did you oh no we didn't investigate 1111 00:57:52,630 --> 00:57:50,240 the oxidation state of manganese i just 1112 00:57:55,109 --> 00:57:52,640 know that it started at manganese two 1113 00:57:56,710 --> 00:57:55,119 we are getting a cation um 1114 00:57:58,630 --> 00:57:56,720 icy though so that is one of the things 1115 00:58:01,190 --> 00:57:58,640 that i'm interested in looking at it 1116 00:58:06,829 --> 00:58:01,200 didn't turn purple it didn't turn purple 1117 00:58:06,839 --> 00:58:11,030 brown any other questions 1118 00:58:13,270 --> 00:58:12,470 in that way of time so i'll ask a 1119 00:58:15,430 --> 00:58:13,280 question 1120 00:58:17,270 --> 00:58:15,440 so um what do you think would hap would 1121 00:58:19,270 --> 00:58:17,280 be the effect of if your iron was in 1122 00:58:21,430 --> 00:58:19,280 varying redox states such as if it 1123 00:58:24,069 --> 00:58:21,440 wasn't just an fe2 hydroxide but a mixed 1124 00:58:26,950 --> 00:58:24,079 fe2 fe3 hydroxide 1125 00:58:28,789 --> 00:58:26,960 good question uh i believe matt has 1126 00:58:30,789 --> 00:58:28,799 actually done some work on that and the 1127 00:58:32,549 --> 00:58:30,799 reaction still proceeded with ferric 1128 00:58:33,670 --> 00:58:32,559 iron right in fact i think it was 1129 00:58:36,230 --> 00:58:33,680 actually 1130 00:58:38,549 --> 00:58:36,240 more efficient with the ferric iron or i 1131 00:58:40,230 --> 00:58:38,559 forget what the actual result was but 1132 00:58:42,150 --> 00:58:40,240 um 1133 00:58:46,470 --> 00:58:42,160 that is a good question i'm not quite 1134 00:58:46,480 --> 00:58:55,349 thank you all right thanks very much 1135 00:58:55,359 --> 00:59:14,069 our next speaker is matt pasek 1136 00:59:19,510 --> 00:59:16,309 hello everyone uh thank you kindly for 1137 00:59:21,349 --> 00:59:19,520 uh the invitation to speak and and today 1138 00:59:23,829 --> 00:59:21,359 i should note as well that this is 1139 00:59:25,589 --> 00:59:23,839 actually uh mahingal is should be the 1140 00:59:28,950 --> 00:59:25,599 lead author on it on this paper but 1141 00:59:31,270 --> 00:59:28,960 instead has uh has two small kids and 1142 00:59:33,589 --> 00:59:31,280 asked me to present in her stead so it 1143 00:59:36,150 --> 00:59:33,599 is a continuation similarly of what 1144 00:59:39,190 --> 00:59:36,160 laura just presented on fenton chemistry 1145 00:59:41,589 --> 00:59:39,200 and reduced phosphorus and the potential 1146 00:59:43,430 --> 00:59:41,599 of doing something interesting with that 1147 00:59:45,430 --> 00:59:43,440 and i'll show you some of the results 1148 00:59:47,030 --> 00:59:45,440 here and so 1149 00:59:49,309 --> 00:59:47,040 her title here is an early earth 1150 00:59:51,430 --> 00:59:49,319 predisposed to phosphonylation and 1151 00:59:53,190 --> 00:59:51,440 phosphorylation by reduced oxidation 1152 00:59:54,789 --> 00:59:53,200 state phosphorus compounds so 1153 00:59:56,789 --> 00:59:54,799 phosphorylation is the addition of 1154 00:59:59,750 --> 00:59:56,799 phosphate phosphonylation is the 1155 01:00:01,990 --> 00:59:59,760 addition of phosphite 1156 01:00:04,390 --> 01:00:02,000 sorry for the names uh the phosphorus 1157 01:00:06,150 --> 01:00:04,400 people got a hold of things and added 1158 01:00:07,829 --> 01:00:06,160 you know many years ago and it becomes 1159 01:00:09,589 --> 01:00:07,839 very hectic especially when you start 1160 01:00:11,150 --> 01:00:09,599 talking about all the various forms of 1161 01:00:13,910 --> 01:00:11,160 phosphorus including things like 1162 01:00:15,910 --> 01:00:13,920 hypophosphite which is shown here is one 1163 01:00:18,309 --> 01:00:15,920 and phosphite which is two and there's a 1164 01:00:20,950 --> 01:00:18,319 hypophosphate which is a plus four 1165 01:00:23,270 --> 01:00:20,960 oxidation state and there's uh uh 1166 01:00:25,230 --> 01:00:23,280 phosphate which is shown here and then 1167 01:00:28,950 --> 01:00:25,240 pyrophosphate and there's a 1168 01:00:30,230 --> 01:00:28,960 pyrophosphite it gets confusing quick 1169 01:00:31,990 --> 01:00:30,240 but 1170 01:00:34,870 --> 01:00:32,000 what we have been looking at is the 1171 01:00:38,390 --> 01:00:34,880 potential of reduced forms of phosphorus 1172 01:00:40,549 --> 01:00:38,400 being able to oxidize and form reactive 1173 01:00:42,470 --> 01:00:40,559 phosphate compounds that could then 1174 01:00:44,309 --> 01:00:42,480 perform key reactions 1175 01:00:45,670 --> 01:00:44,319 and mckeen specifically was 1176 01:00:47,190 --> 01:00:45,680 investigating the reactions between 1177 01:00:48,950 --> 01:00:47,200 reduced oxidation state phosphorus 1178 01:00:50,789 --> 01:00:48,960 compound hypophosphite and that's what 1179 01:00:53,270 --> 01:00:50,799 we'll show specifically here so instead 1180 01:00:54,309 --> 01:00:53,280 of phosphite it is a one plus oxidation 1181 01:00:58,069 --> 01:00:54,319 state 1182 01:01:00,470 --> 01:00:58,079 that can then react with uh the oxide of 1183 01:01:01,990 --> 01:01:00,480 generated by the the fenton chemistry 1184 01:01:03,270 --> 01:01:02,000 and produce reactive phosphorus 1185 01:01:05,030 --> 01:01:03,280 compounds 1186 01:01:07,349 --> 01:01:05,040 we specifically investigated the 1187 01:01:10,549 --> 01:01:07,359 reactions of uridine and adenosine in 1188 01:01:12,309 --> 01:01:10,559 this experiment as well so the 1189 01:01:14,069 --> 01:01:12,319 generation of reduced oxidation state 1190 01:01:16,150 --> 01:01:14,079 phosphorus compounds laura showed kind 1191 01:01:18,549 --> 01:01:16,160 of the uh the general scheme of it right 1192 01:01:20,710 --> 01:01:18,559 here it's a radical induced reaction the 1193 01:01:23,589 --> 01:01:20,720 fenton chemistry specifically forms 1194 01:01:26,069 --> 01:01:23,599 hydroxyl radicals when using iron two 1195 01:01:28,630 --> 01:01:26,079 and those iron those hydroxyl radicals 1196 01:01:31,030 --> 01:01:28,640 rip up that hydrogen phosphorus bond and 1197 01:01:32,710 --> 01:01:31,040 slowly start to oxidize it and the 1198 01:01:36,150 --> 01:01:32,720 interesting thing is you can get a sort 1199 01:01:39,270 --> 01:01:36,160 of possibly a reactive intermediate that 1200 01:01:42,309 --> 01:01:39,280 can form the pyrophosphate triphosphate 1201 01:01:44,950 --> 01:01:42,319 and the cyclic triphosphate as uh sort 1202 01:01:49,589 --> 01:01:44,960 of the oxidized final products it's 1203 01:01:51,270 --> 01:01:49,599 roughly a 70 to 20 to maybe three uh my 1204 01:01:54,789 --> 01:01:51,280 i guess my mass not adding up right 1205 01:01:57,270 --> 01:01:54,799 there 70 to 25 to three to two ratio of 1206 01:01:59,349 --> 01:01:57,280 those four types of compounds here and 1207 01:02:01,349 --> 01:01:59,359 so you use origin originally you use 1208 01:02:03,190 --> 01:02:01,359 some reduced forms of phosphorus oxidize 1209 01:02:05,349 --> 01:02:03,200 those and you can create condensed forms 1210 01:02:07,910 --> 01:02:05,359 of phosphorus condensed phosphates that 1211 01:02:09,829 --> 01:02:07,920 have been used uh previously in several 1212 01:02:11,990 --> 01:02:09,839 reactions to promote phosphorylation 1213 01:02:13,750 --> 01:02:12,000 reactions so the question of course then 1214 01:02:15,589 --> 01:02:13,760 you might have is where are these things 1215 01:02:16,870 --> 01:02:15,599 coming from uh reduced phosphorus you 1216 01:02:19,589 --> 01:02:16,880 can ask 1217 01:02:21,270 --> 01:02:19,599 there's roots from diagenesis uh where 1218 01:02:23,349 --> 01:02:21,280 you take iron two and react with 1219 01:02:25,349 --> 01:02:23,359 phosphate at 200 degrees celsius you can 1220 01:02:27,589 --> 01:02:25,359 make phosphite you can do lightening you 1221 01:02:29,270 --> 01:02:27,599 can have meteoritic materials corrode 1222 01:02:31,109 --> 01:02:29,280 and they will release some phosphate too 1223 01:02:32,870 --> 01:02:31,119 there are some other sources that are 1224 01:02:34,549 --> 01:02:32,880 that we're working on even now that 1225 01:02:36,950 --> 01:02:34,559 there it may have been an important 1226 01:02:39,349 --> 01:02:36,960 constituent on a prebiotic earth 1227 01:02:41,670 --> 01:02:39,359 peroxide is a pretty strong oxidant but 1228 01:02:44,870 --> 01:02:41,680 it is also formed through uv photolysis 1229 01:02:46,789 --> 01:02:44,880 of water um it's found as sort of an ice 1230 01:02:48,870 --> 01:02:46,799 photolysis or radialis product for 1231 01:02:51,670 --> 01:02:48,880 instance on europa so there are ways of 1232 01:02:53,270 --> 01:02:51,680 making a pretty strong oxidant and a 1233 01:02:55,109 --> 01:02:53,280 pretty strong reducing form of 1234 01:02:56,549 --> 01:02:55,119 phosphorus now the interesting thing is 1235 01:02:59,750 --> 01:02:56,559 that reduced phosphorus is actually 1236 01:03:03,190 --> 01:02:59,760 pretty stable we have left a vial of 1237 01:03:05,510 --> 01:03:03,200 phosphite in water stored under air sit 1238 01:03:08,870 --> 01:03:05,520 for five years and had point one percent 1239 01:03:10,309 --> 01:03:08,880 oxidation so this is not a a unstable 1240 01:03:12,150 --> 01:03:10,319 compound that is something that you 1241 01:03:14,630 --> 01:03:12,160 would need to worry about oxidation from 1242 01:03:16,789 --> 01:03:14,640 air or other compound or other oxidants 1243 01:03:19,270 --> 01:03:16,799 in the environment most of what we do is 1244 01:03:21,349 --> 01:03:19,280 phosphorus 31 nmr which is uh the ppm 1245 01:03:23,510 --> 01:03:21,359 scale down here and so this is starting 1246 01:03:25,109 --> 01:03:23,520 material this is hypophosphite 1247 01:03:27,270 --> 01:03:25,119 and it is a triplet because there's two 1248 01:03:29,589 --> 01:03:27,280 hydrogens bound to the phosphorus and 1249 01:03:32,309 --> 01:03:29,599 then when you add the iron and peroxide 1250 01:03:33,589 --> 01:03:32,319 to that you will form uh the phosphite 1251 01:03:35,589 --> 01:03:33,599 in addition to 1252 01:03:37,990 --> 01:03:35,599 to phosphate here and the phosphites 1253 01:03:39,510 --> 01:03:38,000 peak b phosphate is a peak c here and 1254 01:03:41,589 --> 01:03:39,520 there are the pyrophosphate and 1255 01:03:44,549 --> 01:03:41,599 triphosphate that are formed at lower 1256 01:03:47,670 --> 01:03:44,559 concentrations uh further uh up 1257 01:03:50,390 --> 01:03:47,680 uh up field here as well 1258 01:03:53,109 --> 01:03:50,400 so what maheen did uh specifically was 1259 01:03:56,069 --> 01:03:53,119 take a nucleoside in this case uridine 1260 01:03:56,950 --> 01:03:56,079 and then after so i should note after 1261 01:04:04,470 --> 01:03:56,960 the 1262 01:04:06,150 --> 01:04:04,480 it kind of finished she added uridine as 1263 01:04:07,829 --> 01:04:06,160 well as a couple other compounds such as 1264 01:04:11,029 --> 01:04:07,839 urea or 1265 01:04:13,349 --> 01:04:11,039 ammonium hydroxide and then took a look 1266 01:04:15,750 --> 01:04:13,359 and see what you have and so again going 1267 01:04:17,750 --> 01:04:15,760 from the more uh the sort of oxidized 1268 01:04:19,589 --> 01:04:17,760 products of this prior sort of uh 1269 01:04:21,589 --> 01:04:19,599 inorganic spectrum right here and then 1270 01:04:23,910 --> 01:04:21,599 adding after 1271 01:04:25,270 --> 01:04:23,920 the fact a nucleoside you see there's a 1272 01:04:28,069 --> 01:04:25,280 lot of new compounds that have come 1273 01:04:30,710 --> 01:04:28,079 about and these compounds are a number 1274 01:04:31,950 --> 01:04:30,720 of different styles of organics 1275 01:04:34,150 --> 01:04:31,960 mostly 1276 01:04:35,990 --> 01:04:34,160 organophosphonates but also a fair bit 1277 01:04:38,309 --> 01:04:36,000 of organophosphates 1278 01:04:40,390 --> 01:04:38,319 and so these include two prime three 1279 01:04:42,950 --> 01:04:40,400 prime uh five prime phosphites of 1280 01:04:44,549 --> 01:04:42,960 uridine as well as a phosphates there 1281 01:04:46,549 --> 01:04:44,559 appears to be some dimer and i'll show 1282 01:04:49,190 --> 01:04:46,559 you some of that in a little bit and we 1283 01:04:51,430 --> 01:04:49,200 do have some cyclic diester as well the 1284 01:04:54,230 --> 01:04:51,440 total amount of organic phosphorus that 1285 01:04:56,230 --> 01:04:54,240 she is reporting from the integration of 1286 01:04:59,190 --> 01:04:56,240 the the nmr shown here is on the order 1287 01:05:01,589 --> 01:04:59,200 of 22 to 76 percent and 1288 01:05:03,270 --> 01:05:01,599 the you know that is as a fraction of 1289 01:05:05,910 --> 01:05:03,280 phosphorus that is visible within the 1290 01:05:08,549 --> 01:05:05,920 phosphorus nmr 1291 01:05:10,309 --> 01:05:08,559 so sort of a larger perspective of this 1292 01:05:12,230 --> 01:05:10,319 in a sort of more whole field we as well 1293 01:05:14,470 --> 01:05:12,240 use phosphonyl acetic acid as our 1294 01:05:18,870 --> 01:05:14,480 standard which pops up at our ph at 1295 01:05:21,990 --> 01:05:18,880 about uh ph uh about 15.5 ppm and then 1296 01:05:23,190 --> 01:05:22,000 over at uh the sort of 20 ppm is the 1297 01:05:27,829 --> 01:05:23,200 cyclic 1298 01:05:30,150 --> 01:05:27,839 prime uridine phosphate and then you see 1299 01:05:31,750 --> 01:05:30,160 that the inorganic uh phosphorus 1300 01:05:33,549 --> 01:05:31,760 compounds as well as the organic 1301 01:05:35,750 --> 01:05:33,559 phosphates and organic phos 1302 01:05:38,390 --> 01:05:35,760 organophosphonates are present at these 1303 01:05:39,109 --> 01:05:38,400 lower ranges right here and then blown 1304 01:05:42,230 --> 01:05:39,119 up 1305 01:05:44,390 --> 01:05:42,240 right around minus one is what we 1306 01:05:47,029 --> 01:05:44,400 believe to be diesters so that is 1307 01:05:50,309 --> 01:05:47,039 uridine phosphate uridine phosphate 1308 01:05:52,470 --> 01:05:50,319 uridine and there is a sort of chemistry 1309 01:05:54,470 --> 01:05:52,480 that's going on with this this is a 1310 01:05:56,950 --> 01:05:54,480 add this stuff to the compound and then 1311 01:05:59,190 --> 01:05:56,960 let it sit and slowly dry out i should 1312 01:06:02,069 --> 01:05:59,200 add that she is doing this at around 58 1313 01:06:03,270 --> 01:06:02,079 to 65 degrees celsius um 1314 01:06:05,670 --> 01:06:03,280 and then to see what sorts of 1315 01:06:07,430 --> 01:06:05,680 phos-related organics she is producing 1316 01:06:09,589 --> 01:06:07,440 and uh again you have some of the 1317 01:06:11,349 --> 01:06:09,599 uridine uh the we spike this with 1318 01:06:13,990 --> 01:06:11,359 austenitic sample of uradine uh 1319 01:06:16,789 --> 01:06:14,000 five-prime monophosphate and indeed the 1320 01:06:19,349 --> 01:06:16,799 the peak e here is one that rises uh 1321 01:06:21,109 --> 01:06:19,359 when when spiked here 1322 01:06:24,069 --> 01:06:21,119 so to summarize what she sees with 1323 01:06:25,349 --> 01:06:24,079 uridine uh we have our uridine starting 1324 01:06:27,589 --> 01:06:25,359 product and then we have the uridine 1325 01:06:29,190 --> 01:06:27,599 phosphates uh from the phi prime the two 1326 01:06:31,190 --> 01:06:29,200 prime to three prime and then the cyclic 1327 01:06:33,349 --> 01:06:31,200 three two prime three prime in addition 1328 01:06:34,789 --> 01:06:33,359 there are the phosphites also probably 1329 01:06:37,589 --> 01:06:34,799 in the similar condition but you do not 1330 01:06:39,190 --> 01:06:37,599 form the cyclic uridine phosphite um 1331 01:06:40,470 --> 01:06:39,200 because there is no negative charge on 1332 01:06:42,950 --> 01:06:40,480 the phosphite to kind of keep it 1333 01:06:45,589 --> 01:06:42,960 stabilized and then as well there are 1334 01:06:48,069 --> 01:06:45,599 the dimers that are being produced there 1335 01:06:49,910 --> 01:06:48,079 and then if you take adenosine you see 1336 01:06:52,549 --> 01:06:49,920 something very similar the adenosine 1337 01:06:55,190 --> 01:06:52,559 also forms adenosine monophosphates and 1338 01:06:57,349 --> 01:06:55,200 adenosine monophosphites as well as the 1339 01:07:00,230 --> 01:06:57,359 adenosine cyclic two three two prime 1340 01:07:02,549 --> 01:07:00,240 three prime uh phosphate there is also 1341 01:07:05,109 --> 01:07:02,559 this peak corresponding to a dimer as 1342 01:07:07,910 --> 01:07:05,119 well um i should add that when sampled 1343 01:07:09,750 --> 01:07:07,920 by uh m uh mass spectrometry the these 1344 01:07:12,710 --> 01:07:09,760 peaks were all matched to a specific 1345 01:07:14,710 --> 01:07:12,720 gamma or z uh but um 1346 01:07:16,230 --> 01:07:14,720 so there is mass spec 1347 01:07:17,910 --> 01:07:16,240 evidence for each of these compounds as 1348 01:07:19,190 --> 01:07:17,920 well 1349 01:07:20,789 --> 01:07:19,200 so 1350 01:07:22,870 --> 01:07:20,799 again very similar compounds that are 1351 01:07:25,510 --> 01:07:22,880 formed with using adenosine in place of 1352 01:07:27,109 --> 01:07:25,520 uridine suggesting that this style 1353 01:07:29,270 --> 01:07:27,119 chemistry could work 1354 01:07:31,270 --> 01:07:29,280 again after the fact as opposed to being 1355 01:07:34,150 --> 01:07:31,280 subjected to the oxidizing conditions of 1356 01:07:35,430 --> 01:07:34,160 the fenton chemistry and then using a 1357 01:07:36,829 --> 01:07:35,440 two 1358 01:07:40,309 --> 01:07:36,839 deoxyri 1359 01:07:42,470 --> 01:07:40,319 and subjecting that to the these 1360 01:07:44,549 --> 01:07:42,480 conditions we took a look at to see if 1361 01:07:46,309 --> 01:07:44,559 the similar chemistry would come about 1362 01:07:49,910 --> 01:07:46,319 and intriguingly you see here that there 1363 01:07:51,910 --> 01:07:49,920 is no peak corresponding to the um to 1364 01:07:54,069 --> 01:07:51,920 the dimer in this case the dimer would 1365 01:07:56,870 --> 01:07:54,079 appear between zero and and minus two 1366 01:07:58,950 --> 01:07:56,880 right here and it's not there and there 1367 01:08:00,630 --> 01:07:58,960 is additionally no cyclic two prime 1368 01:08:04,069 --> 01:08:00,640 three prime because there it is not 1369 01:08:07,430 --> 01:08:04,079 possible with uh the deoxy adenosine and 1370 01:08:09,270 --> 01:08:07,440 suggesting perhaps that the cyclic uh 1371 01:08:11,270 --> 01:08:09,280 uridine or adenosine two prime three 1372 01:08:13,910 --> 01:08:11,280 prime is the key intermediate forming 1373 01:08:16,870 --> 01:08:13,920 the dimer here 1374 01:08:18,709 --> 01:08:16,880 so the late addition of the organics to 1375 01:08:20,630 --> 01:08:18,719 the solution so after the fenton 1376 01:08:23,829 --> 01:08:20,640 chemistry is kind of burned off much of 1377 01:08:25,349 --> 01:08:23,839 the oxygen appears to be necessary and 1378 01:08:27,590 --> 01:08:25,359 laura showed that very well that 1379 01:08:30,229 --> 01:08:27,600 glycerol is getting ripped up by the 1380 01:08:31,669 --> 01:08:30,239 fentany conditions pretty clearly uh we 1381 01:08:33,669 --> 01:08:31,679 took a look to see the stability of 1382 01:08:37,030 --> 01:08:33,679 adenosine so if you take adenosine this 1383 01:08:39,189 --> 01:08:37,040 is a carbon-13 nmr uh sort of the 1384 01:08:42,630 --> 01:08:39,199 the standard adenosine and then 1385 01:08:43,990 --> 01:08:42,640 subjected to one day of reaction in phen 1386 01:08:46,390 --> 01:08:44,000 chemistry you see some of these peaks 1387 01:08:48,709 --> 01:08:46,400 are starting to drop down two days and 1388 01:08:51,189 --> 01:08:48,719 then three days right here effectively 1389 01:08:53,910 --> 01:08:51,199 all the carbon has become carbonate or 1390 01:08:55,110 --> 01:08:53,920 similar fully oxidized forms of carbon 1391 01:08:57,510 --> 01:08:55,120 so the 1392 01:08:59,430 --> 01:08:57,520 addition of organics it would it 1393 01:09:00,870 --> 01:08:59,440 unfortunately is not a one pot reaction 1394 01:09:02,709 --> 01:09:00,880 that we often seek in prebiotic 1395 01:09:04,550 --> 01:09:02,719 chemistry but is at least a two pot 1396 01:09:07,269 --> 01:09:04,560 reaction in this case 1397 01:09:08,870 --> 01:09:07,279 problematic but there is some promise as 1398 01:09:10,789 --> 01:09:08,880 far as forming dimers and other 1399 01:09:13,430 --> 01:09:10,799 compounds in this chemistry here 1400 01:09:16,630 --> 01:09:13,440 so to kind of summarize uh the best 1401 01:09:18,630 --> 01:09:16,640 reactions between 70 and 80 yield of 1402 01:09:20,309 --> 01:09:18,640 total organic phosphorus that includes 1403 01:09:23,349 --> 01:09:20,319 the organophosphates as well as the 1404 01:09:25,510 --> 01:09:23,359 organic phosphates uh it occurs when you 1405 01:09:28,229 --> 01:09:25,520 use urea and ammonium 1406 01:09:30,950 --> 01:09:28,239 as constituents of this chemistry 1407 01:09:32,709 --> 01:09:30,960 she's done this experiment now several 1408 01:09:35,349 --> 01:09:32,719 dozen times and has been able to get 1409 01:09:37,430 --> 01:09:35,359 these results at least reproducibly and 1410 01:09:39,269 --> 01:09:37,440 her chemistry suggests that the ammonia 1411 01:09:40,709 --> 01:09:39,279 compounds including ammonia from urea 1412 01:09:42,470 --> 01:09:40,719 seems to be kind of 1413 01:09:44,149 --> 01:09:42,480 very helpful in generating reactive 1414 01:09:46,789 --> 01:09:44,159 phosphorus compounds 1415 01:09:48,630 --> 01:09:46,799 that promote condensed phosphates uh 1416 01:09:51,669 --> 01:09:48,640 that we are looking for in sort of our 1417 01:09:53,349 --> 01:09:51,679 prebiotic chemistry and the dimers seem 1418 01:09:55,590 --> 01:09:53,359 to be coming out in this chemistry as 1419 01:09:57,270 --> 01:09:55,600 well and organics could potentially 1420 01:09:58,390 --> 01:09:57,280 survive some of the harsh peroxide 1421 01:10:00,550 --> 01:09:58,400 conditions 1422 01:10:02,229 --> 01:10:00,560 it they're gone in about three days but 1423 01:10:04,470 --> 01:10:02,239 one day there's still some adenosine 1424 01:10:06,550 --> 01:10:04,480 left as well so with that i'll say 1425 01:10:16,470 --> 01:10:06,560 thanks to our collaborators and our 1426 01:10:16,480 --> 01:10:28,950 we have time for a couple questions 1427 01:10:32,790 --> 01:10:31,030 great dog so i have a question how much 1428 01:10:34,870 --> 01:10:32,800 peroxide do you need to have those 1429 01:10:36,630 --> 01:10:34,880 reactions is this probiotically 1430 01:10:38,790 --> 01:10:36,640 plausible 1431 01:10:40,709 --> 01:10:38,800 that is a good question so you need a 1432 01:10:43,910 --> 01:10:40,719 fair bit more stoichiometric peroxide 1433 01:10:47,510 --> 01:10:43,920 than iron so roughly uh you need four 1434 01:10:49,590 --> 01:10:47,520 equivalents of peroxide to every phos 1435 01:10:51,750 --> 01:10:49,600 hypophosphite or two equivalents for 1436 01:10:53,990 --> 01:10:51,760 every phosphite 1437 01:10:56,870 --> 01:10:54,000 that's a fair bit 1438 01:10:58,390 --> 01:10:56,880 it is added you can add it slowly over 1439 01:11:00,070 --> 01:10:58,400 the course of a day or you can add it 1440 01:11:01,189 --> 01:11:00,080 all at once 1441 01:11:02,709 --> 01:11:01,199 there is 1442 01:11:04,630 --> 01:11:02,719 not really a lot of difference in the 1443 01:11:05,669 --> 01:11:04,640 chemistry the final resulting chemistry 1444 01:11:08,229 --> 01:11:05,679 but 1445 01:11:10,709 --> 01:11:08,239 it is on the order in this case of 1446 01:11:16,550 --> 01:11:10,719 hundreds of millimoles so and that's 1447 01:11:20,550 --> 01:11:18,550 hey matt great talk um luke stella from 1448 01:11:22,070 --> 01:11:20,560 the australian center for astrobiology 1449 01:11:23,590 --> 01:11:22,080 um i was really interested seeing those 1450 01:11:26,470 --> 01:11:23,600 dimers come up and i was wondering if 1451 01:11:28,790 --> 01:11:26,480 you saw anything longer um anymore like 1452 01:11:30,630 --> 01:11:28,800 yeah longer polymerization and right if 1453 01:11:32,470 --> 01:11:30,640 not what you could do to maybe promote 1454 01:11:35,350 --> 01:11:32,480 that and get some nice little polymers 1455 01:11:38,470 --> 01:11:35,360 for me that is a fantastic question um 1456 01:11:40,390 --> 01:11:38,480 by mass so unfortunately with nmr you're 1457 01:11:42,310 --> 01:11:40,400 kind of looking at either monomeric 1458 01:11:45,030 --> 01:11:42,320 phosphate or dimeric phosphate or 1459 01:11:47,189 --> 01:11:45,040 polymeric phosphate if you will 1460 01:11:48,149 --> 01:11:47,199 dimeric and polymeric phosphate look the 1461 01:11:50,149 --> 01:11:48,159 same 1462 01:11:51,270 --> 01:11:50,159 when we looked by mass spec we only saw 1463 01:11:53,510 --> 01:11:51,280 the dimer 1464 01:11:56,229 --> 01:11:53,520 so trimer would be excellent but we 1465 01:11:57,910 --> 01:11:56,239 didn't happen to see that far ahead so 1466 01:11:59,590 --> 01:11:57,920 right now only the dimers i can say 1467 01:12:05,669 --> 01:11:59,600 conclusively 1468 01:12:09,590 --> 01:12:06,950 i have a question 1469 01:12:11,590 --> 01:12:09,600 so um so thinking about the last two 1470 01:12:13,110 --> 01:12:11,600 talks so if you have ammonia that's 1471 01:12:14,790 --> 01:12:13,120 required for this reaction do you think 1472 01:12:16,630 --> 01:12:14,800 it's possible that that ammonia could be 1473 01:12:18,870 --> 01:12:16,640 generated by some of these iron 1474 01:12:21,350 --> 01:12:18,880 hydroxides from say reduction of nitrate 1475 01:12:22,390 --> 01:12:21,360 or nitrite right right so you know of 1476 01:12:24,229 --> 01:12:22,400 course there's 1477 01:12:25,990 --> 01:12:24,239 the the mixing of this chemistry 1478 01:12:28,149 --> 01:12:26,000 involves very reduced phases very 1479 01:12:29,990 --> 01:12:28,159 oxidizing phases the ammonia is a pretty 1480 01:12:32,390 --> 01:12:30,000 reduced phase as well 1481 01:12:35,270 --> 01:12:32,400 so yeah i mean i suppose that if you had 1482 01:12:38,470 --> 01:12:35,280 an environment that 1483 01:12:40,229 --> 01:12:38,480 you had pretty spatially different 1484 01:12:42,149 --> 01:12:40,239 types of disequilibrium maybe something 1485 01:12:45,350 --> 01:12:42,159 like that could arise where you had your 1486 01:12:47,270 --> 01:12:45,360 reduced ammonium and phosphite in one 1487 01:12:48,950 --> 01:12:47,280 area that then came in contact with 1488 01:12:50,390 --> 01:12:48,960 peroxide and the iron as sort of the 1489 01:12:52,550 --> 01:12:50,400 boundary that would be a 1490 01:13:03,669 --> 01:12:52,560 an interesting possibility 1491 01:13:26,630 --> 01:13:04,630 all maybe 1492 01:13:33,189 --> 01:13:30,630 okay uh hello everyone i am yuta hiroko 1493 01:13:35,750 --> 01:13:33,199 a phd student at the university 1494 01:13:37,270 --> 01:13:35,760 in japan today i will talk about the 1495 01:13:39,510 --> 01:13:37,280 effects of bull rate 1496 01:13:40,630 --> 01:13:39,520 on selective phosphorylation arrivals on 1497 01:13:42,630 --> 01:13:40,640 the areas 1498 01:13:44,470 --> 01:13:42,640 my research interest is the origin of 1499 01:13:47,669 --> 01:13:44,480 rna and the 1500 01:13:50,390 --> 01:13:47,679 original nucleotide 1501 01:13:52,950 --> 01:13:50,400 and the rna is one of the most important 1502 01:13:56,070 --> 01:13:52,960 molecules for the original life and it 1503 01:13:58,550 --> 01:13:56,080 can hold the information and catalyze 1504 01:14:01,270 --> 01:13:58,560 some chemical reactions in your body 1505 01:14:02,950 --> 01:14:01,280 so many researchers suppose that 1506 01:14:06,310 --> 01:14:02,960 primordial life 1507 01:14:09,189 --> 01:14:06,320 used rna for their supplication 1508 01:14:12,709 --> 01:14:09,199 this this theory is called rna world 1509 01:14:15,750 --> 01:14:12,719 hypothesis and based on this hypothesis 1510 01:14:18,070 --> 01:14:15,760 the rna formation is a crucial step for 1511 01:14:21,590 --> 01:14:18,080 the original life 1512 01:14:24,950 --> 01:14:21,600 and rna is a polymer of ribonucleotide 1513 01:14:27,830 --> 01:14:24,960 so we need to make ribonucleotide first 1514 01:14:30,310 --> 01:14:27,840 and ribonucleotide is consists of three 1515 01:14:32,470 --> 01:14:30,320 components ribose 1516 01:14:34,470 --> 01:14:32,480 nucleus and 1517 01:14:36,390 --> 01:14:34,480 phosphate 1518 01:14:38,870 --> 01:14:36,400 whilst i'll introduce 1519 01:14:41,510 --> 01:14:38,880 the previous research of prebiotic 1520 01:14:42,550 --> 01:14:41,520 nucleotide formation 1521 01:14:45,350 --> 01:14:42,560 and 1522 01:14:47,830 --> 01:14:45,360 many many previous researches many 1523 01:14:51,030 --> 01:14:47,840 researchers have tried nucleotide 1524 01:14:53,590 --> 01:14:51,040 synthesis and red figure shows 1525 01:14:55,510 --> 01:14:53,600 the nucleotide synthesis pathway and 1526 01:14:57,590 --> 01:14:55,520 right figures of the side 1527 01:14:59,830 --> 01:14:57,600 phosphorylation 1528 01:15:02,470 --> 01:14:59,840 nucleotide synthesis generally needs 1529 01:15:05,270 --> 01:15:02,480 step by step reaction using small 1530 01:15:07,669 --> 01:15:05,280 reactive molecules like cyanomolecules 1531 01:15:09,110 --> 01:15:07,679 or cyanoacetamine 1532 01:15:11,430 --> 01:15:09,120 on the other hand 1533 01:15:14,390 --> 01:15:11,440 the nuclear site phosphorylation is a 1534 01:15:15,750 --> 01:15:14,400 one pole reaction using small catalysts 1535 01:15:17,990 --> 01:15:15,760 like urea 1536 01:15:21,669 --> 01:15:18,000 and common point of this previous 1537 01:15:24,550 --> 01:15:21,679 research is the reaction order 1538 01:15:26,550 --> 01:15:24,560 nuclear site synthesis first and flowing 1539 01:15:29,910 --> 01:15:26,560 postulation 1540 01:15:31,750 --> 01:15:29,920 on the other hand we can also assume the 1541 01:15:34,470 --> 01:15:31,760 alternative pathway 1542 01:15:35,830 --> 01:15:34,480 labels phosphorylation first and 1543 01:15:37,350 --> 01:15:35,840 nuclear based 1544 01:15:38,870 --> 01:15:37,360 addition later 1545 01:15:41,030 --> 01:15:38,880 however 1546 01:15:44,229 --> 01:15:41,040 the previous research focusing on this 1547 01:15:46,149 --> 01:15:44,239 alternative pathway is limited 1548 01:15:48,870 --> 01:15:46,159 some paper shows 1549 01:15:51,750 --> 01:15:48,880 nucleotide formation from ribose 5 prime 1550 01:15:53,830 --> 01:15:51,760 phosphate but as far as we know nobody 1551 01:15:55,189 --> 01:15:53,840 reported the ribose 5 brain phosphate 1552 01:15:57,430 --> 01:15:55,199 formation from 1553 01:16:00,149 --> 01:15:57,440 ribose and of phosphate under the 1554 01:16:03,110 --> 01:16:00,159 prioritically plausible condition 1555 01:16:05,669 --> 01:16:03,120 this motivated us to investigate the 1556 01:16:08,470 --> 01:16:05,679 ribose frustration on the areas 1557 01:16:11,910 --> 01:16:08,480 and so why is it difficult to form 1558 01:16:13,990 --> 01:16:11,920 ribose fibrin phosphate 1559 01:16:16,950 --> 01:16:14,000 there are two reasons 1560 01:16:20,390 --> 01:16:16,960 stability and selectivity 1561 01:16:22,870 --> 01:16:20,400 first of all ribose is very unstable 1562 01:16:25,669 --> 01:16:22,880 sugars in heat condition 1563 01:16:27,590 --> 01:16:25,679 and phosphorylation generally needs heat 1564 01:16:31,110 --> 01:16:27,600 and dry condition 1565 01:16:33,350 --> 01:16:31,120 but ribose is easily broke down in and 1566 01:16:35,830 --> 01:16:33,360 reacting each other in such condition 1567 01:16:38,470 --> 01:16:35,840 and turn to brown tau 1568 01:16:41,110 --> 01:16:38,480 and second it is difficult to 1569 01:16:42,709 --> 01:16:41,120 phosphorylate at right position of 1570 01:16:47,669 --> 01:16:42,719 ribose 1571 01:16:50,310 --> 01:16:47,679 for solution but right was one prime 1572 01:16:52,470 --> 01:16:50,320 phosphate was selectively formed not 1573 01:16:56,470 --> 01:16:52,480 fibrin phosphate for the chemical 1574 01:16:59,110 --> 01:16:56,480 evolution to rna we need right structure 1575 01:17:02,709 --> 01:16:59,120 molecules so it is necessary to form 1576 01:17:05,110 --> 01:17:02,719 ribose 5-prime phosphate 1577 01:17:07,510 --> 01:17:05,120 these two issues make it difficult to 1578 01:17:10,229 --> 01:17:07,520 form ribose fiber and phosphate 1579 01:17:13,350 --> 01:17:10,239 so to solve this problem 1580 01:17:15,669 --> 01:17:13,360 we focused on bull rate 1581 01:17:18,950 --> 01:17:15,679 bullet will have existed on the 1582 01:17:21,910 --> 01:17:18,960 biopolitic environment on the areas and 1583 01:17:24,709 --> 01:17:21,920 where it can stabilize rivals by forming 1584 01:17:27,270 --> 01:17:24,719 rival at this rival sport complex 1585 01:17:30,950 --> 01:17:27,280 so bullet ridge environment could have 1586 01:17:33,669 --> 01:17:30,960 accumulated rivals on the areas 1587 01:17:36,149 --> 01:17:33,679 buried also contribute to the original 1588 01:17:38,630 --> 01:17:36,159 selective phosphorylation 1589 01:17:41,110 --> 01:17:38,640 this previous research reported the 1590 01:17:43,350 --> 01:17:41,120 nucleotide phosphorylation at 1591 01:17:46,310 --> 01:17:43,360 five prime hydroxy 1592 01:17:48,950 --> 01:17:46,320 so we consider that this bullet that we 1593 01:17:51,669 --> 01:17:48,960 can apply these bullet abilities to 1594 01:17:54,550 --> 01:17:51,679 ribose phosphorylation so the objective 1595 01:17:56,470 --> 01:17:54,560 of this research is to investigate the 1596 01:17:59,270 --> 01:17:56,480 factor bullet and bullet ridge 1597 01:18:01,830 --> 01:17:59,280 environment on the phosphorylation of 1598 01:18:04,550 --> 01:18:01,840 ribose to find a new root a new 1599 01:18:07,030 --> 01:18:04,560 alternative route to nucleotide 1600 01:18:08,790 --> 01:18:07,040 okay let's move on to the experimental 1601 01:18:11,830 --> 01:18:08,800 method 1602 01:18:14,070 --> 01:18:11,840 for the ribose for the liposolation we 1603 01:18:15,669 --> 01:18:14,080 perform the thermal evaporation 1604 01:18:19,510 --> 01:18:15,679 experiment 1605 01:18:21,990 --> 01:18:19,520 simple 1606 01:18:23,590 --> 01:18:22,000 first we prepare the acquisition 1607 01:18:27,110 --> 01:18:23,600 containing 1608 01:18:28,790 --> 01:18:27,120 ribose and distortion more phosphate 1609 01:18:32,070 --> 01:18:28,800 and boric acid 1610 01:18:35,590 --> 01:18:32,080 and urea as a phosphorylation catalyst 1611 01:18:38,310 --> 01:18:35,600 the solution was heated for 24 hours at 1612 01:18:40,870 --> 01:18:38,320 80 degrees c with the with the leads 1613 01:18:42,950 --> 01:18:40,880 open to evaporate the solution 1614 01:18:46,229 --> 01:18:42,960 after the experiment we added the 1615 01:18:49,510 --> 01:18:46,239 sulfuric acid solution to the sample and 1616 01:18:53,110 --> 01:18:49,520 heated it for one hour at 90 degrees c 1617 01:18:55,830 --> 01:18:53,120 to separate bullet and urea from ribose 1618 01:18:58,470 --> 01:18:55,840 and then we analyze the sample by hpl 1619 01:19:03,750 --> 01:19:01,270 here is the result the upper figure is 1620 01:19:04,870 --> 01:19:03,760 the standard of rivals what rivals 1621 01:19:07,030 --> 01:19:04,880 phosphate 1622 01:19:08,390 --> 01:19:07,040 and lower figure the experimental 1623 01:19:11,510 --> 01:19:08,400 product 1624 01:19:14,630 --> 01:19:11,520 and x-axis is the retention time 1625 01:19:17,669 --> 01:19:14,640 and y-axis is the intensity 1626 01:19:19,750 --> 01:19:17,679 the block line is the standard of rivals 1627 01:19:21,030 --> 01:19:19,760 fibrin phosphate and this is the target 1628 01:19:24,310 --> 01:19:21,040 material 1629 01:19:27,189 --> 01:19:24,320 and the blue line in the ribose two 1630 01:19:29,110 --> 01:19:27,199 prime phosphate and aeroline the ribose 1631 01:19:32,470 --> 01:19:29,120 three point phosphate standard 1632 01:19:35,590 --> 01:19:32,480 and red figures uh the fragment pattern 1633 01:19:38,070 --> 01:19:35,600 spectra of ribose fibrin phosphate and 1634 01:19:40,550 --> 01:19:38,080 experimental product 1635 01:19:43,830 --> 01:19:40,560 this this data showed that ribose 1636 01:19:45,990 --> 01:19:43,840 5-prime phosphate was selectively formed 1637 01:19:48,470 --> 01:19:46,000 in the in the reaction 1638 01:19:50,870 --> 01:19:48,480 and these fragment pattern spectra also 1639 01:19:52,870 --> 01:19:50,880 indicate that this peak is ribose 1640 01:19:55,430 --> 01:19:52,880 5-prime phosphate 1641 01:19:57,910 --> 01:19:55,440 we calculated the yield based on the 1642 01:20:00,630 --> 01:19:57,920 peak area and it was 1643 01:20:02,630 --> 01:20:00,640 22 percent and this yield is 1644 01:20:05,669 --> 01:20:02,640 significantly high as a probiotic 1645 01:20:11,510 --> 01:20:09,350 here is the result in our sense of void 1646 01:20:13,830 --> 01:20:11,520 we could detect the ribose fibrin 1647 01:20:16,149 --> 01:20:13,840 phosphate and this fragment pattern 1648 01:20:19,189 --> 01:20:16,159 spectra also indicates this peak is 1649 01:20:23,270 --> 01:20:19,199 ribose fibrin phosphate but 1650 01:20:25,910 --> 01:20:23,280 the yield was only four percent so 1651 01:20:29,189 --> 01:20:25,920 these data show that ribose uh sorry uh 1652 01:20:32,790 --> 01:20:29,199 borage can improve the yield of ribose 1653 01:20:38,870 --> 01:20:36,709 we also evaluate the product amount of 1654 01:20:40,629 --> 01:20:38,880 each other pentoses in addition to 1655 01:20:44,070 --> 01:20:40,639 ribose because 1656 01:20:47,590 --> 01:20:44,080 why ribose was selected as uh the soil 1657 01:20:49,910 --> 01:20:47,600 rna component is also a significant 1658 01:20:51,510 --> 01:20:49,920 problem for the original life 1659 01:20:54,390 --> 01:20:51,520 here is the result 1660 01:20:56,070 --> 01:20:54,400 the upper left figure is the result of 1661 01:20:58,229 --> 01:20:56,080 ribose experiment 1662 01:20:59,510 --> 01:20:58,239 and upper right is the robinus 1663 01:21:02,310 --> 01:20:59,520 experiment 1664 01:21:03,830 --> 01:21:02,320 and lower left is xylose and lower right 1665 01:21:05,750 --> 01:21:03,840 is rig source 1666 01:21:08,550 --> 01:21:05,760 and each yields 1667 01:21:11,189 --> 01:21:08,560 for 22 percent in ribose 1668 01:21:13,350 --> 01:21:11,199 8 percent in your abinos 1669 01:21:15,750 --> 01:21:13,360 4 percent in xyros 1670 01:21:18,870 --> 01:21:15,760 and eleven percent in rick's cells 1671 01:21:20,950 --> 01:21:18,880 so surprisingly ribose experiment had 1672 01:21:24,709 --> 01:21:20,960 the highest yield among all other 1673 01:21:27,590 --> 01:21:24,719 pentoses in the presence of borate 1674 01:21:31,430 --> 01:21:27,600 on the other hand in our sense of bullet 1675 01:21:33,510 --> 01:21:31,440 each yields were four percent arrivals 1676 01:21:35,030 --> 01:21:33,520 four percent in arabinose 1677 01:21:40,629 --> 01:21:35,040 two percent in 1678 01:21:43,110 --> 01:21:40,639 there was no apparent difference in the 1679 01:21:46,229 --> 01:21:43,120 yield in the absence of bullet 1680 01:21:49,270 --> 01:21:46,239 so this result suggests that bullet can 1681 01:21:51,910 --> 01:21:49,280 improve the increased selectivity of 1682 01:21:58,310 --> 01:21:55,590 so ribose is very unstable sugars and 1683 01:22:01,350 --> 01:21:58,320 other sugars must have existed on the 1684 01:22:04,950 --> 01:22:01,360 probiotic earth so it remains unclear 1685 01:22:07,590 --> 01:22:04,960 why ribose was selected as surrounding 1686 01:22:10,149 --> 01:22:07,600 rna component 1687 01:22:11,990 --> 01:22:10,159 some previous research reported that a 1688 01:22:14,950 --> 01:22:12,000 bullet can contribute to the 1689 01:22:16,709 --> 01:22:14,960 preferential formation of rivals and in 1690 01:22:18,709 --> 01:22:16,719 this research 1691 01:22:21,189 --> 01:22:18,719 we also 1692 01:22:24,470 --> 01:22:21,199 found that bullet can contribute to the 1693 01:22:27,030 --> 01:22:24,480 preferential phosphorylation arrivals 1694 01:22:28,950 --> 01:22:27,040 in other words bullet can increase the 1695 01:22:31,990 --> 01:22:28,960 selectivity of libels 1696 01:22:35,669 --> 01:22:32,000 not only sugar formation but also 1697 01:22:41,750 --> 01:22:38,950 okay let me summarize my presentation 1698 01:22:43,110 --> 01:22:41,760 this figure shows the reaction pathway 1699 01:22:46,629 --> 01:22:43,120 reaction root 1700 01:22:50,070 --> 01:22:46,639 or to nucleotide in biosynthesis 1701 01:22:52,629 --> 01:22:50,080 this study and previous research 1702 01:22:55,270 --> 01:22:52,639 in this study we found that ribose 1703 01:22:57,750 --> 01:22:55,280 5-prime phosphate was formed 1704 01:23:00,870 --> 01:22:57,760 with 22 percent yield 1705 01:23:02,870 --> 01:23:00,880 this reaction is one pole reaction and 1706 01:23:04,470 --> 01:23:02,880 the yield was significantly high in the 1707 01:23:07,270 --> 01:23:04,480 presence of bullet 1708 01:23:10,229 --> 01:23:07,280 so we can consider that this reaction is 1709 01:23:11,590 --> 01:23:10,239 geologically possible 1710 01:23:13,910 --> 01:23:11,600 on the other hand 1711 01:23:16,790 --> 01:23:13,920 previous research nuclear cell synthesis 1712 01:23:20,070 --> 01:23:16,800 needs step-by-step reaction using very 1713 01:23:21,430 --> 01:23:20,080 unstable molecules and very complicated 1714 01:23:23,350 --> 01:23:21,440 procedure 1715 01:23:25,350 --> 01:23:23,360 on the earliest 1716 01:23:29,030 --> 01:23:25,360 the vampire reaction must have 1717 01:23:31,270 --> 01:23:29,040 preferentially occurred compared to the 1718 01:23:33,669 --> 01:23:31,280 step-by-step reaction 1719 01:23:37,030 --> 01:23:33,679 these findings open the new route to 1720 01:23:39,590 --> 01:23:37,040 nucleotide and this route is 1721 01:23:42,070 --> 01:23:39,600 phosphorylation code first and 1722 01:23:44,790 --> 01:23:42,080 nuclear waste combined later 1723 01:23:47,910 --> 01:23:44,800 this route is more geologically possible 1724 01:23:52,629 --> 01:23:47,920 than previous research route and it also 1725 01:23:54,149 --> 01:23:52,639 close to the order of biosynthesis 1726 01:23:56,709 --> 01:23:54,159 in conclusion 1727 01:23:59,189 --> 01:23:56,719 we found that borate and blood rich 1728 01:24:01,669 --> 01:23:59,199 environment could have contributed to 1729 01:24:03,669 --> 01:24:01,679 the preferential formation of ribose 1730 01:24:06,149 --> 01:24:03,679 5-prime phosphate 1731 01:24:08,310 --> 01:24:06,159 and further chemical evolution to rna 1732 01:24:09,590 --> 01:24:08,320 will have a chord say in the same 1733 01:24:12,070 --> 01:24:09,600 environment 1734 01:24:14,229 --> 01:24:12,080 so these findings 1735 01:24:15,430 --> 01:24:14,239 for these findings 1736 01:24:18,950 --> 01:24:15,440 show that 1737 01:24:21,590 --> 01:24:18,960 the bullet voltage environment 1738 01:24:25,430 --> 01:24:21,600 could have been a probable place for the 1739 01:24:27,750 --> 01:24:25,440 origin of nucleotide and rna 1740 01:24:36,070 --> 01:24:27,760 this is the summary and endometrites 1741 01:24:36,080 --> 01:24:47,270 time for a couple questions 1742 01:24:51,990 --> 01:24:49,189 steve banner very nice talk thank you 1743 01:24:53,350 --> 01:24:52,000 very much for that as you know your 1744 01:24:56,229 --> 01:24:53,360 supervisor 1745 01:24:57,750 --> 01:24:56,239 yoshi furukawa has isolated with 1746 01:25:00,709 --> 01:24:57,760 students 1747 01:25:04,149 --> 01:25:00,719 ribose from meteorites yes 1748 01:25:05,990 --> 01:25:04,159 is there borate in those meteorites 1749 01:25:10,229 --> 01:25:06,000 um 1750 01:25:12,629 --> 01:25:10,239 actually we don't find what minerals in 1751 01:25:14,629 --> 01:25:12,639 the meteorites so 1752 01:25:15,910 --> 01:25:14,639 this is a recovery speculation as to how 1753 01:25:17,430 --> 01:25:15,920 ribose 1754 01:25:18,790 --> 01:25:17,440 got into the meteor i mean it seemed to 1755 01:25:20,070 --> 01:25:18,800 me that it would be very nice to have 1756 01:25:22,870 --> 01:25:20,080 bori there 1757 01:25:26,550 --> 01:25:22,880 because of your work yeah um 1758 01:25:28,550 --> 01:25:26,560 yes we fought we tried to find the 1759 01:25:31,110 --> 01:25:28,560 reaction pathway in 1760 01:25:33,350 --> 01:25:31,120 forming ribose in meteorites so 1761 01:25:39,990 --> 01:25:33,360 simulating meteorites condition 1762 01:25:43,910 --> 01:25:42,229 basic uh usf uh so you might have said 1763 01:25:45,830 --> 01:25:43,920 that but what is your phosphate source 1764 01:25:48,709 --> 01:25:45,840 in this case um 1765 01:25:49,669 --> 01:25:48,719 alpha space starts 1766 01:25:51,350 --> 01:25:49,679 um 1767 01:25:54,149 --> 01:25:51,360 yeah 1768 01:25:56,709 --> 01:25:54,159 yes 1769 01:25:58,390 --> 01:25:56,719 hey utah um luke stiller again um big 1770 01:26:00,870 --> 01:25:58,400 fan of your work love everything you're 1771 01:26:03,510 --> 01:26:00,880 doing um i was just wondering what ph 1772 01:26:05,590 --> 01:26:03,520 you're using at those experiments and 1773 01:26:07,830 --> 01:26:05,600 in light of that um we had a chat before 1774 01:26:10,470 --> 01:26:07,840 around how some bored minerals can be 1775 01:26:12,550 --> 01:26:10,480 very insoluble at higher phs and i was 1776 01:26:14,390 --> 01:26:12,560 wondering if you thought about um yeah 1777 01:26:16,149 --> 01:26:14,400 like what mineral source you would have 1778 01:26:18,470 --> 01:26:16,159 for your boric acid and how that might 1779 01:26:19,750 --> 01:26:18,480 be impacted by the ph 1780 01:26:22,310 --> 01:26:19,760 um 1781 01:26:23,270 --> 01:26:22,320 i don't i 1782 01:26:26,709 --> 01:26:23,280 in my 1783 01:26:31,030 --> 01:26:26,719 experiment 1784 01:26:33,270 --> 01:26:31,040 i don't use symbolic void minerals and 1785 01:26:36,390 --> 01:26:33,280 but we 1786 01:26:39,430 --> 01:26:36,400 we assume that some turmeric void rich 1787 01:26:43,110 --> 01:26:39,440 minerals is a 1788 01:26:46,149 --> 01:26:43,120 potential bullet flows because with the 1789 01:26:49,830 --> 01:26:46,159 bullet the solubility was found in 1790 01:26:51,910 --> 01:26:49,840 argent metal sediment and so we can we 1791 01:26:54,070 --> 01:26:51,920 consider that well the tolerance is the 1792 01:26:56,950 --> 01:26:54,080 best candidate for the 1793 01:26:59,510 --> 01:26:56,960 voice source in your experiment 1794 01:27:00,310 --> 01:26:59,520 and what ph is the experiment 1795 01:27:02,149 --> 01:27:00,320 uh 1796 01:27:07,830 --> 01:27:02,159 the ph is around nine 1797 01:27:14,550 --> 01:27:10,100 thank you very much thank you very much 1798 01:27:17,750 --> 01:27:16,310 so that concludes our session so thank